0
There were plenty;
- Militairy: Romans were known for their well-trained, disciplined, hardened and organized troops. They used battle-lines, tactics and all kinds of different ranks. The 'barbarians', which is more of a collective name, were much less organised and usually stormed towards their opponents. Some did have sophisticated weapons like the Brittanic chariot. Romans had ballista's and all kinds of siege weapons.
- Social: The Romans had an empire with an emperor who ruled supreme. Even though there was a Senate, it did'NT have much influence after the rise of Augustus (Octavianus). The 'barbarians' were mostly made up of tribes, with a bandleader or warlord making the decisions. The Romans used this separation between the tribes in an early form of 'divide and conquer'.
- Political: Early Rome had a Senate and a (really) minor democracy with a king, until Caesar and Augustus, the first true emperor of Rome. Feuds and problems were solved by the famous Roman Law, which is the foundation of most modern laws. Most 'barbarian' tribes settled problems by banning one or several members or by a fight to the death.
- Technology: The Romans were way ahead. Hygiene for example was much better. They had bathhouses (thermen), aquaducts, fountains with clear, fresh water and a decent sewer system. They had a lenghty road-network of good quality and a solid economy, especially compared to the peoples to the north.
What else can I help you with?
What are some differences between the Inca and Aztec?
The Incas were less violent then the Aztecs
What happened when Celts died?
actually the celts did not die , instead they now live with romans . some celts died due to a war between the romans and the celts . now some people like celtic music and clothes
What are some differences between the achievements of the ancient greek and roman civilizations?
same question... geography assignment.
What are the differences between the Mayans and the Aztecs?
The Mayan people were very similar to the Aztecs, but there are some subtle differences. Mainly it's in the way that they constructed their giant temples. The Mayans preferred a different grade of stone.
What did the Romans sleep on?
Some Romans slept in the nude, some wearing their underwear, some fully clothed. The Latin language distinguished between the amictus which were worn during the day and indumenta, which were worn day and night (usually this referred to underwear). Many Romans kept on their subligaculum (a linen loincloth knotted round the waist). Women did not take off their strophium or mamillare (bra). There were people who did not undress. They just took their cloak off and put it on the bed as extra bedding or on a chair.
What are some differences between Soldiers and Militias?
What are some differences between soldiers and Militias
What are some adjectives for Barbarians?
Some adjectives for Barbarians could include fierce, uncivilized, and savage.
What are some roman xenophobia?
The Romans were xenophobic towards the peoples who lived outside the Roman Empire. They called them barbarians a word which they borrowed from Greek. It meant foreigners and had a pejorative connotation.
What are some differences between the way a hangfish feeds?
what are some differences between the way a hang fish feeds
Who is considered the founder of the Eastern Roman Empire?
There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.
What are the differences between Poland and US?
what are some differences between poland and the united states of america
How did many Christians react to the disintegration of Roman society during the time of the Roman Empire?
Many Romans near the end of the Roman Empire had converted from paganism to Christianity. Thus, they were pacifists, and not eager to fight the barbarians. Therefore, some of them almost welcomed the barbarians, as life for the poor in Rome was horrible, and couldn't get much worse no matter who was in charge.
Who are some barbarians in history?
* Atilla the HUN * Visigoths
What are some differences between the wolverine and a penguin?
everything
Is a junior rowing eight shorter than a senior?
No, but there can be some differences between lightweight, midweight, and heavy weight boats; also some differences between manufacturers.
What were the differences between the olmecs and the Mayans?
what are some of the diffrentces between mayans and the olmecs
What are some differences between the royal Canadian mounted police then and now?
Some of the differences are that the nwmp had some different things to deal with than the rcmp.
