A history book about the Five Good Emperors of Rome is considered a secondary source. It interprets, analyzes, and synthesizes information from primary sources, such as ancient texts, inscriptions, and archaeological findings related to that period. Secondary sources provide context and commentary rather than firsthand accounts of events.
There are many types of warriors, the Zulu, Roman, Viking... You Should look that up in a book.
There is no god or goddess I am aware of called "umbriel". It's a character in a book.
Cleopatra VII did not save her country. Read a history book! She lost her country to the Roman empire.
Roman Catholic AnswerWe do not know, the only mention of St. Antipas is in the book of Revelation, although he may have been martyred on April 11 as that is his feast day, around the year 90.
It is a primary source
The is not a book of Roman legends written by the Romans
To cite a primary source within a book in MLA format, include the author of the primary source, the title of the primary source, the title of the book, the editor of the book (if applicable), the publisher, the publication year, and the page numbers.
Primary - as it is a document produced at the time. It is not some later report.
The title page of a book is considered a primary source as it provides information directly from the original publication itself. It is a firsthand source of information about the book, including the title, author, publisher, and publication date.
To cite a primary source within a book, include the author's name, the title of the primary source, the title of the book, the editor (if applicable), the publication year, and the page number where the source is found. Use the appropriate citation style, such as APA or MLA, to format the citation correctly.
he's a primary source because he was alive during that time he knew what was going on he didn't get it from a book
If you know what a secondary source is, then you should know that everything is both a primary and a secondary source, but on what is always the question. So, if you are wondering if it is a primary source on the war crimes trials, then clearly it is not as Marrus was not there. But there may be primary source material used in the book.
A reference book is typically not considered a primary source because it compiles information from various sources rather than presenting original or firsthand information.
primary because a fossil is a thing you first see. if it was a book about fossils then its secondary.
There are two kinds of sources...primary and secondary. A primary source is information you see with your own eyes. An example would be a book written in first person, or a newspaper article. A secondary source is information that has been passed on. An example of this would be a gossip magazene or fiction book. Hope this helps :)
There are two kinds of sources...primary and secondary. A primary source is information you see with your own eyes. An example would be a book written in first person, or a newspaper article. A secondary source is information that has been passed on. An example of this would be a gossip magazene or fiction book. Hope this helps :)