He knew Nag and Nagaina's plan and he killed nag after killing him he tried to kill Nagaina and killed her.
I think Nagaina deserves no mercy because she plans to get revenge on Rikki-tikki for killing her husband
Never.
Killing someone is not justified unless it is in self-defense or defense of others in imminent danger. If Johnny killed Bob without valid cause, it would not be considered justified.
By killing Nag and eventually Nagaina.
Peasants did not kill the tsar and his family, they were taken down to a basement and shot by Bolsheviks. They were not justified to killing them either though.
No. There is no justification in killing civilians for political ends.
Because Nagaina was going to bite the little boy that found Rikki and then they were gonna fight but Rikki got one of Nagaina eggs and was gonna smash it but Nagaina didn't want him to so she give up and ran away into a house and Rikki ran after.After night Rikki never came out and every animal thought he died but when they were about to leave Rikki came out and killed Nagaina. Then the garden became safe and there was no more killing again.
By distracting Nagaina, threatening to smash the last egg remaining from her nest.
yes B/C you are defending your country.
In Greek mythology, the killing of Phineas by Perseus was seen as justified because Phineas was threatening Perseus's wife, Andromeda, and showed hostility towards him. Additionally, Phineas was portrayed as a villain who had wronged others, which further justified Perseus's actions in seeking revenge.
No, killing the deputy is not justified. Tom's actions could be seen as self-defense in the situation, but taking a life is a serious act that should typically be avoided whenever possible. The circumstances surrounding the killing should be thoroughly investigated and judged accordingly.