critical legal anthropologists
Franz Boas introduced the concept of cultural relativism into American anthropology. Cultural relativism is the idea that a person's beliefs, values, and practices should be understood based on that person's own culture, rather than being judged against the criteria of another culture. This idea has had a significant impact on how anthropologists approach the study of human societies and cultures.
Yes, an example would be the current cultural changes against smoking.Years ago, it was common for folk to spit in the street - seldom observed outside the sports field these days.
One way African slaves resisted the dehumanizing aspects of slavery was by maintaining cultural practices, such as music, dance, and storytelling, that helped preserve their identity and sense of community. These cultural expressions served as acts of resistance against the attempts to suppress their humanity and autonomy.
The politics of representation refers to how anthropologists represent various groups of people, the power embedded in those representations (who gets to speak for whom, and what picture they get to paint) as well as how those representations are used, both by the group itself and by other interested parties, to serve particular agendas. Imagine, for example, an anthropologist who writes about the ritual practices of a particular indigenous group. Then imagine that the indigenous group objects to that representation, saying it's either false or that the anthropologist has no right to write about it. That's the politics of representation. Or imagine that the indigenous group likes the representation, and uses the anthropologist's writing to make a case for land rights or cultural uniqueness or to market themselves to tourists. That's also the politics of representation. Or imagine that the anthropologist's depiction is used by the government to make a case against the group represented, saying it's a savage or backward group that should be domesticated. That's the politics of representation too. I hope that helps!
Homo erectus likely developed adaptations such as the ability to use fire for warmth and cooking, the crafting of clothing for insulation, and the construction of simple shelters to protect against cold temperatures. These cultural advancements would have helped them survive and thrive in temperate zones as they migrated out of their original tropical environments.
legal pluralists
I can give you several sentences.They discriminate against black people in that restaurant.I hate to see anyone discriminate against someone else.It's wrong to discriminate.
In Islam- Muslims are to wear suitable clothes, Men and Women alike. Women should not wear revealing clothes as it allows Men to approach, attack, or discriminate against them.
God doesn't discriminate against Gay people, but a lot of God's followers do.
No, states cannot discriminate against citizens of other states according to the Privileges and Immunities Clause in the U.S. Constitution.
No, it is not!
Yes, discrimination is against the law.
Yes. Anyone can discriminate against anyone.
Not positive- it's either "to" or "discriminate". a verb is an action word.
No.
i think all races discriminate against each other it is not just white people. when you say white people you say it as a whole as in everyone that is white hates every other race... that is not true. blacks discriminate... Chinese discriminate... Mexican discriminate... it isn't just white people... it is what you choose to see it as.
It is not US policy.