Homo erectus likely found occasions such as successful hunts or food gatherings, successful tool-making, or the discovery of new resources to be special. They may have also valued social gatherings, ceremonies, or rituals that fostered group cohesion and community bonds.
If Homo erectus was capable of language, it would have likely been some kind of proto-language, which lacked complete grammar and syntax of modern languages. But know one knows for certain.
Homo erectus inhabited a range of habitats, from open savannas to forests, approximately 1.9 million to 70,000 years ago. They were adaptable and able to live in a variety of environments across Africa, Asia, and Europe. They were known to have used fire for cooking and warmth, which likely aided their ability to survive in different environments.
H. habilis had a cranial capacity slightly less than half of the size of modern humans. They were short, just over 4 ft tall with disproportionately long arms - more similar to the modern chimpanzee, than man. Debates continue over whether H. habilis is a direct human ancestor - the size of the cranial cavity makes me think they did not have the mental capacity to form a religion or partake in any sort of meaningful ceremonies.
"Homo" in Greek means "same" or "equal." It is used in words like "homogeneous" (same kind) or "homophobia" (fear of the same).
"Human beings (that's us) are known as homo sapiens sapiens. DNA testing has shown that the closest relative of human beings is Neanderthal Man (homo sapiens neanderthalus). Neanderthal Man is now extinct. The closest living of human beings now is the chimpanzee. Neanderthal Man was a much closer relative to us than the chimpanzee." =============================Mitochondrial DNA testing shows that Neanderthal WAS NOT a genetic ancestor to modern H.Sapiens - but only similar kind of species . Refer to National Geographic:http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/episode/neanderthal-code-3228/04#tab-evolving-view-4 ============================= I hope I did not give anyone the impression that Neanderthal man was our ancestor. The relationship is more like a cousin. How close a cousin Neanderthal man was to us is a good question, but Neanderthal Man was much closer to us than is the chimpanzee.
Homo erectus are a lot different from their ancestor's, they use stones as tools to hunt.
If Homo erectus was capable of language, it would have likely been some kind of proto-language, which lacked complete grammar and syntax of modern languages. But know one knows for certain.
they made tools like clubs, spears, bows and arrows, and fire was kind of like a tool, it was for protection.
Let's see. In the evolution of the genus Homo (as in Homo Erectus, Homo Neandertalensis, and Homo Sapiens), the upright individual would have had his hands free AND his brain sufficiently developed around 50,000 to 100,000 years ago, for this kind of development to have occurred. But that's still conjecture, just a guess.
Big koala costumes and capes
Sometimes, it depends on what kind of occasion
If you mean Asian Georgia, the first kind of people there was Homo Erectus, who reached the Caucasus mountains in Georgia around 1,300,000 BC. They were from Africa.
Homo erectus inhabited a range of habitats, from open savannas to forests, approximately 1.9 million to 70,000 years ago. They were adaptable and able to live in a variety of environments across Africa, Asia, and Europe. They were known to have used fire for cooking and warmth, which likely aided their ability to survive in different environments.
It is a kind of french fries that is served with seaweed shaker in MacDonald's in special occasions only
The H. erectus.
What foods that Muslims eat on special occasions will vary depending on where they live. Muslims in the middle east often eat lamb on special occasions. They also enjoy a dessert called baklava.
H. habilis had a cranial capacity slightly less than half of the size of modern humans. They were short, just over 4 ft tall with disproportionately long arms - more similar to the modern chimpanzee, than man. Debates continue over whether H. habilis is a direct human ancestor - the size of the cranial cavity makes me think they did not have the mental capacity to form a religion or partake in any sort of meaningful ceremonies.