The kind of evidence that archaeologists, anthropologists and paleontologist study are bones, artifacts, culture, and fossils.
A paleo-anthropologist is similar to a biological anthropologist as they both study human evolution, biological adaptations, and the behavior of early humans, but a paleo-anthropologist specifically focuses on the study of fossil evidence and ancient hominins to understand human origins and evolution.
the evidence that scientists use to study prehistoric times is looking for places where people may have lived long agomy name is Stephanie opene and i am a lesbianis DNA and the body
The study of prehistoric humans and prehumans is called paleoanthropology. It involves examining fossils, artifacts, and other evidence to understand the evolution and behavior of early human ancestors.
In prehistoric times, diseases such as tuberculosis, syphilis, leprosy, and dental cavities were present. Evidence from skeletal remains and archaeological studies provide insights into the health challenges faced by ancient populations.
Technically, an anthropologist studies all aspects of humanity - physical (or biological), cultural, and archaeological. The archaeologist has a narrower field, and studies the past by recovering and analyzing artifacts and evidence of material culture. There is a great deal of overlap between the two disciplines.
ruins mostly.
a a a
a a a
archaeologists have found very shocking evidence. Where do archaeologists work?
Some specialists that study prehistory include archaeologists, paleoanthropologists, and paleontologists. Archaeologists study human history through material remains, paleoanthropologists study human evolution through fossil evidence, and paleontologists study ancient life forms through fossil records.
Paleontologists study prehistoric forms of life, including dinosaurs, ancient mammals, and early forms of plants. They use fossil evidence to understand the evolution and behaviors of these organisms that lived millions of years ago.
ruins mostly.
Archaeologists knew that people lived in the Sahara thousands of years ago through the discovery of ancient rock art, tools, and burial sites. These artifacts provided evidence of human presence and activities in the region during prehistoric times.
NO
they do observations
All paleontologists,(and other people), notice that on every continent, there were similar fossils. Obviously, not all prehistoric/Precambrian organisms could swim all the way across oceans, so the continents had to have moved. This proved Wegener's hypothesis(some really old scientist i learned about in science class)which was continental drift.
Paleontological and archeological evidence about hominid evolution.