Roman coins marked with "WRL" are typically modern replica or fantasy coins and do not hold significant numismatic value. Authentic Roman coins, which are often identified by their Latin inscriptions or emperor's portrait, can hold significant historical and monetary value depending on factors like rarity, condition, and provenance. It is recommended to consult with a professional numismatist to determine the authenticity and value of any Roman coin.
The U.S. did not use Roman numerals on $5 gold coins, only nickels from 1883 to 1912 and $20 coins in 1907. The U.S. did not mint any gold coins after 1933. Please check what you have and post a new question with more details to help ID it.
Old coins from countries or islands that no longer exist can have value to collectors due to their rarity and historical significance. The value of these coins can vary based on factors such as their condition, age, and demand in the numismatic market. It is recommended to consult with a professional coin dealer or appraiser to get an accurate assessment of their worth.
Neanderthals did not have a monetary system or use coins. The concept of currency and coins originated much later in human history.
A Sacagawea coin with no date is likely a minting error known as a "mule coin." These coins are valuable to collectors and can potentially be worth more than its face value, depending on its condition and rarity. It is recommended to have the coin authenticated by a professional to determine its value accurately.
You've got to give the country of origin, the year, and the denomination. Africa is made out of many countries, many of which have issued gold coins and even within a country the denominations can vary. For example, a 1/10th of an ounce South African Krugerrand is worth around $165 or so, whereas a full ounce Krugerrand can be worth $1700 or so depending on the price of gold.
£1,000,000
Not much, they are worth their face value
no
Only for numismatic purposes.
Since they less gold in to coins they were worth less then they were before
Anything from the Franklin mint is overpriced and not worth nearly as much as their sales prices. The only coins from Franklin worth anything are those made with silver.
Yes, the coins are worth something. Many of the coins are valued in price close to $3 each depending upon their condition.
Roman coins were round metal disks in different values. There was the As, the Dupondius, the Sestertius, the Quadrans, the Denarius, and the Aureus. The as was the basic unit of money. The dupondius was worth two as, the sestertius was worth four as, the quadrans was also worth four as, the denarius was worth 16 as and the aurus was worth 400 as. The as,dupondius, sestertius and quadrans were all bronze coins. The denarius was silver and the aureus was gold.
Hardly anything above their face value.
Retail values are $2.00-$6.00 for average coins
depends what you consiter rare over a cource of hundreds of years millions of coins were produced by the roman empire some coins are scarce and could be worth $1000 + but then again most coins you find arn't that scarce and could only be worth $10 even less for culls i buy my coins off eBay for around $.75 each and i get about a half that show good detail
The hyperinflation of the third century BC was caused by continued debasement (reduction in the precious metal content) of the Roman gold and silver coins. This devalued the coins. Several emperors had done this as a means to increase the amount of coins they could have to pay for increases in public expenditure, especially increases military expenses due to increases in the size of the army and the pay of soldiers. Eventually, the coins hardly had any precious metal content and were not worth anything. Although there were too many coins being minted, there were hardly any in circulation as people hoarded the older coins because the newer one were worth less.