0
What else can I help you with?
What are some good subjects to minor in with archaeology as a major?
As archaeology is such a broad subject which borrows a lot of its theory and methodology from other subjects a lot of subjects would be relevant. Most common combinations would probably include history, social or physical anthropology, geosciences, physics or biology. However, choose based on what interests you.
What is archival studies?
Archival studies is a field concerned with the theory and practice of preserving, managing, and providing access to records and documents with long-term value. Archivists work to ensure the authenticity, reliability, and usability of these materials for research, administrative, and legal purposes.
Why is Africa considered the cradle of human life?
Africa is considered the cradle of human life because it is where the earliest anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens) originated and evolved over millions of years. Fossil evidence, genetic studies, and archaeological findings support the theory that humans first emerged in Africa before spreading to other regions of the world.
How can archaeological and palaeontology findings of human evolution prove the out of Africa theory of human migration?
Archaeology is the study of 'human activity' and palaeontology is the study of 'fossils'. Meaning that whenever someone found bones/fossils, palaeontology has helped use DNA to find how long the bones/fossils have been there for. Archaeology has helped prove what palaeontology found out.
Where do most Scientists and archaeologists agree that nomadic hunters and seafarers migrated to the Americas from?
Most scientists and archaeologists agree that nomadic hunters and seafarers migrated to the Americas from Asia, specifically crossing the Bering land bridge around 15,000 years ago. This theory is supported by genetic, archaeological, and linguistic evidence.
Which people where one of the first to invade Rome and rule for 100 years?
According to the fashionable theory, in this period Rome was conquered by the Etruscans. However, this is just that, a theory. It has been challenged. Its evidence base is flimsy, to say the least. It is also based on unproven assumptions. Recent archaeological finds seem to suggest a different picture.
Facts lending support to the Aryan Invasion Theory?
There is no actual proof to support the Aryan Invasion Theory. It was a weakly-invented story created by the British when they went to conquer India. The reason for the creation of this theory was to make the native peoples believe that they were inferior and had to succumb to the British. According to the theory, the Aryans came from an area north of India. Recent archaeological activity and many scientific studies have proven that this theory is false, so don't just take it from me.
Did the Etruscans conquer Rome?
Although the theory that the Etruscans conquered Rome is very fashionable, it is just that, a theory. It is based on unproven assumptions and it evidence base is flimsy, to say the least. It is most likely that the Etruscans did not conquer Rome. There is no record of it. More recent archaeological finds seem to suggest a different picture.
Was Mars struck by a Pluto sized body about four billion years ago?
Well, I believe so. Recent studies supported that theory...
What does the Communication Theory study?
The Communication Theory studies a specific study. It studies the technical process of information and the human process of human communication. This is what the Communication Theory studies.
When they overthrew the Etruscans in 510 BC what did the Romans decide not to have in their society?
A king. It is now disputed that Rome was ever conquered by the Etruscans or were ever under Etruscan domination. The evidence-base of this fashionable theory is very flimsy and has been challenged. More recent archaeological finds seem to suggest a different picture. The republic was established by overthrowing the Roman monarchy.
What if the etruscans destroyed rome before they became an empire?
If the Etruscans had destroyed Rome, it would have been the end of the city and there would not have been an empire unless the Romans would have recovered and managed to rebuild their city. If your question has been prompted by the theory that the Etruscans conquered Rome, note that is just a theory. Unfortunately it has often been put as a historical fact, rather than a hypothesis. The evidence base of this theory is flimsy and it has now been challenged. recent archaeological evidence seems to suggest a different picture.
What people ruled the Romans for centurys?
Rome was always ruled by the Romans. There is a fashionable theory which holds that the Etruscans conquered Rome in the 6th century BC. This is just that, a theory. It has been challenged. Its evidence base is flimsy and it is based on unproven assumptions. Recent archaeological evidence suggests a different picture.
What is recent research findings support Darwins theory of evolution?
Recent research findings, such as genomic studies that show patterns of genetic similarities among different species, provide evidence supporting Darwin's theory of evolution. These studies have revealed the common ancestry of all living organisms and how species have evolved over time through natural selection. Additionally, fossil evidence continues to be found that further corroborates the theory of evolution by showing transitional forms between different species.
What is the evidence of the asiatic theory?
The Asiatic theory suggests that Native Americans originated from Asia and migrated to the Americas via the Bering Land Bridge. Evidence supporting this theory includes genetic studies showing similarities between Asian and Native American populations, as well as archaeological findings of ancient tools and artifacts in both regions that are similar in style and construction. Additionally, linguistic studies have identified similarities between certain Native American languages and languages spoken in Siberia.
Why did Romans rebel against Etuscans?
The fashionable theory that the Etruscans conquered Rome in the 7th century BC is just that, a theory. It has been challenged. Its evidence base is flimsy to say the least and its assumptions are unproven and implausible. Recent archaeological evidence suggests a different picture. There is no actual historical record of an Etruscan invasion of Rome.
Who took over rome and in what BC did it happen?
Nobody took over Rome. There is a fashionable theory which argues that the Etruscans took over Rome in the 6th century BC. This theory has now been challenged. Its evidence base is flimsy, it rests on unproven assumptions and there is no historical record for it. Recent archaeological evidence suggests a different picture.
