0
The conquests led by Francisco Pizarro and Hernan Cortes were military campaigns that resulted in the conquest of the Inca Empire in South America and the Aztec Empire in Mexico, respectively. Both conquistadors used superior weaponry, alliances with indigenous groups opposed to the ruling empires, and tactics of terror and intimidation to achieve their goals. These conquests ultimately paved the way for Spanish colonization of the Americas.
What else can I help you with?
How is Francisco Pizarro and Hernando Cortes different?
Francisco Pizarro conquered the Inca Empire in South America, while Hernando Cortes conquered the Aztec Empire in Mexico. Pizarro's conquest led to the establishment of the Viceroyalty of Peru, while Cortes' conquest led to the establishment of New Spain. Their tactics and approaches to conquest differed, with Pizarro relying more on political maneuvering and alliances, while Cortes used military force and alliances with indigenous groups.
What are the three spanish explorers?
Three famous Spanish explorers are Christopher Columbus, Hernan Cortes, and Francisco Pizarro. Columbus is known for his voyages to the Americas, Cortes for the conquest of the Aztec Empire, and Pizarro for the conquest of the Inca Empire.
How do you Compare and contrast the exploration of Francisco Pizarro and Hernando Cortes?
Both Francisco Pizarro and Hernando Cortes were Spanish conquistadors who played key roles in the Spanish conquest of the Americas. Cortes is best known for his conquest of the Aztec Empire in present-day Mexico, while Pizarro is known for the conquest of the Inca Empire in present-day Peru. While both expeditions were marked by brutal tactics and the ultimate subjugation of indigenous peoples, Cortes had a more significant impact on Aztec society due to the downfall of their powerful empire, whereas Pizarro's conquest dismantled the Inca Empire's political structure without completely eradicating their culture.
What did he expeditions of Herman Cortes and Francisco Pizarro resulted in?
The expeditions of Hernan Cortes resulted in the conquest of the Aztec Empire in present-day Mexico. Francisco Pizarro's expeditions led to the conquest of the Inca Empire in present-day Peru. Both conquests greatly expanded Spanish influence in the Americas.
What did Herman cotes and francisco Pizarro have in common?
Hernan Cortes and Francisco Pizarro were both Spanish conquistadors who played crucial roles in the Spanish conquest of the Americas. They led expeditions that resulted in the downfall of powerful indigenous empires—Cortes conquered the Aztec Empire in present-day Mexico, while Pizarro conquered the Inca Empire in present-day Peru.
How is Francisco Pizarro and Hernando Cortes different?
Francisco Pizarro conquered the Inca Empire in South America, while Hernando Cortes conquered the Aztec Empire in Mexico. Pizarro's conquest led to the establishment of the Viceroyalty of Peru, while Cortes' conquest led to the establishment of New Spain. Their tactics and approaches to conquest differed, with Pizarro relying more on political maneuvering and alliances, while Cortes used military force and alliances with indigenous groups.
What to effects did the conquest of Cortes and Pizarro have on US history?
They stop and the found out that you can sail
What are the three spanish explorers?
Three famous Spanish explorers are Christopher Columbus, Hernan Cortes, and Francisco Pizarro. Columbus is known for his voyages to the Americas, Cortes for the conquest of the Aztec Empire, and Pizarro for the conquest of the Inca Empire.
How do you Compare and contrast the exploration of Francisco Pizarro and Hernando Cortes?
Both Francisco Pizarro and Hernando Cortes were Spanish conquistadors who played key roles in the Spanish conquest of the Americas. Cortes is best known for his conquest of the Aztec Empire in present-day Mexico, while Pizarro is known for the conquest of the Inca Empire in present-day Peru. While both expeditions were marked by brutal tactics and the ultimate subjugation of indigenous peoples, Cortes had a more significant impact on Aztec society due to the downfall of their powerful empire, whereas Pizarro's conquest dismantled the Inca Empire's political structure without completely eradicating their culture.
Who were cruelly treated by Cortes and Pizarro?
The Aztecs and Inca were cruelly treated by Cortes and Pizarro.
What did he expeditions of Herman Cortes and Francisco Pizarro resulted in?
The expeditions of Hernan Cortes resulted in the conquest of the Aztec Empire in present-day Mexico. Francisco Pizarro's expeditions led to the conquest of the Inca Empire in present-day Peru. Both conquests greatly expanded Spanish influence in the Americas.
What did Herman cotes and francisco Pizarro have in common?
Hernan Cortes and Francisco Pizarro were both Spanish conquistadors who played crucial roles in the Spanish conquest of the Americas. They led expeditions that resulted in the downfall of powerful indigenous empires—Cortes conquered the Aztec Empire in present-day Mexico, while Pizarro conquered the Inca Empire in present-day Peru.
Did Cortes exploit unrest within the Aztec empire to achieve his conquest of tenochtitlan?
No. That was Pizarro who conquered the Incans. Cortes relied on the Quetzalcoatl myth to pass as a God, get close to the Aztec emperor and ultimately betray him and conquer Mexico.
Who is related to Francisco Pizarro?
Cortes
The conquistadors Hernan Cortes and Francisco Pizarro led invasions into the territory of what two native peoples?
Pizarro was with the Incas, and Cortes was with the Aztecs.
What was the name of the group Hernan Cortes and Francisco Pizarro represented?
Hernan Cortes and Francisco Pizarro were Spanish conquistadors and represented Spain.
How were the explorations of Francisco Pizarro and Fernando Cortes similar and different?
Both Francisco Pizarro and Fernando Cortes were Spanish conquistadors who led expeditions to conquer indigenous civilizations in the Americas, but their conquests occurred in different regions. Pizarro conquered the Inca Empire in South America (Peru), while Cortes conquered the Aztec Empire in Central America (Mexico). Additionally, their methods of conquest differed, with Pizarro relying more on political maneuvering and exploiting internal Inca divisions, while Cortes utilized a combination of military force, diplomacy, and alliances with indigenous groups to defeat the Aztecs.
