Historians use a variety of clues to study the past, including written records, archaeological artifacts, artwork, oral histories, and scientific analysis of materials like carbon dating. These clues help them piece together a more complete picture of past events, societies, and cultures. Comparing and cross-referencing different sources allows historians to build a more accurate understanding of historical events.
Historians use primary sources such as documents and artifacts, secondary sources like books and articles, oral histories from witnesses, and archaeological evidence to find clues about the past.
Historians use a variety of clues to piece together the past, including written records, artifacts, architecture, artwork, and oral history. They also utilize scientific methods such as carbon dating and archaeological techniques to uncover and analyze evidence. By combining these different sources of information, historians can construct a more accurate understanding of historical events and societies.
geographers dig up fossils..what_happens.">Different historians investigate the past differenty for example - cryptographer: breaks codes or study codes for example ancient egyptian symbols used in tombs- archaeologist: dig up the past for example fossils, bones egyptian tombs et- anthropologist: study nature like apps, monkeys, humans-paleontologist: studies fossilsand just to add a motive is a reason why someone does something. a consequence is the result of an action. The whathappens.They study the past because this affects the modern world from what happened in the past
Historians and archaeologists use primary sources (first-hand accounts), secondary sources (interpretations of primary sources), artifacts and material culture (objects from the past), and scientific methods (carbon dating, DNA analysis) to uncover and interpret historical information.
A historian is like a detective because they find out clues and use them as evidence. They are not like historians because usually, they are not trying to solve a case, they are just trying to find out facts
Historians study the past by studying the previous recorded events of the past activities. They use both the scientific and traditional methods to gather such information which they then use to compile their documentary evidence.
Historians use primary sources such as documents and artifacts, secondary sources like books and articles, oral histories from witnesses, and archaeological evidence to find clues about the past.
they think about clues they got when they find artifact's from prehistory that how historians investigate the past.
Fossils, Artifacts, or they search in libraries for history books or old books about the past.
Fossils, Artifacts, or they search in libraries for history books or old books about the past.
they use the evidence from the past that will tell them what exactly happened, or they ask people who were at that certain place and time.
They use DNA to compare human remains from the past with people living today
Historians use a variety of clues to piece together the past, including written records, artifacts, architecture, artwork, and oral history. They also utilize scientific methods such as carbon dating and archaeological techniques to uncover and analyze evidence. By combining these different sources of information, historians can construct a more accurate understanding of historical events and societies.
geographers dig up fossils..what_happens.">Different historians investigate the past differenty for example - cryptographer: breaks codes or study codes for example ancient egyptian symbols used in tombs- archaeologist: dig up the past for example fossils, bones egyptian tombs et- anthropologist: study nature like apps, monkeys, humans-paleontologist: studies fossilsand just to add a motive is a reason why someone does something. a consequence is the result of an action. The whathappens.They study the past because this affects the modern world from what happened in the past
Historians and archaeologists use primary sources (first-hand accounts), secondary sources (interpretations of primary sources), artifacts and material culture (objects from the past), and scientific methods (carbon dating, DNA analysis) to uncover and interpret historical information.
Because their cool. lol get it right
A historian is like a detective because they find out clues and use them as evidence. They are not like historians because usually, they are not trying to solve a case, they are just trying to find out facts