Many sources that historians use are not as reliable as those used by a detective. They have to compile different sources from the same era to determine their accuracy.
Literary sources can provide valuable insight into people's beliefs, customs, and daily life, but they may be subjective or biased. Archaeological sources provide tangible evidence of past societies and can offer more objective information about material culture and social practices. Both types of sources are valuable, and using them together can provide a more comprehensive understanding of history.
Bronze tools were better than stone tools because bronze is harder, more durable, and holds a sharper edge. This made them more effective for cutting, shaping, and striking objects, giving them a longer lifespan and making them more efficient for various tasks.
Historians prioritize analyzing and interpreting historical data to understand its significance and meaning, rather than focusing solely on its accuracy. Interpretation allows historians to uncover complexities, patterns, and context within the data, offering insights into the past that go beyond simple facts. This approach fosters a deeper understanding of historical events and their lasting impact.
WikiAnswers will not do your homework for you. Nor will it write your discussion paper, critiques or essays. That is considered cheating. If you have a specific question in the subject we are more than willing to help.
Historians prioritize facts over opinions because their goal is to accurately reconstruct the past based on evidence. By focusing on facts, historians can develop a more objective understanding of historical events, individuals, and trends. This allows for a more reliable interpretation of the past that can contribute to a better understanding of history.
Historians often deal with incomplete, biased, or conflicting sources, making it challenging to piece together an accurate narrative. Unlike detectives who may have access to physical evidence, historians must interpret and analyze historical documents to construct their understanding of the past. Additionally, historical sources may be limited by the perspectives or agendas of their creators, requiring historians to critically evaluate their reliability.
no, teeth are harder than rocks
No. Diamond is harder than emerald.
explorer
Harder Than the Best was created in 1979.
Tungsten is a metal that is harder than steel.
To work harder than your hardest involves you pushing yourself to the limit, working harder than you ever have before.
If the question is: A historian is writing a book about the fall of the Soviet Union. He claims that the country collapsed because it spent too much of its money on its military rather than providing domestic services to its people. What is the best way to determine whether the historian’s interpretation is valid? Then the answer would be: Corroborate the interpretation with other secondary sources.
Yes they do
much harder :)
Psychic Detectives - 2004 More Than a Dream 4-8 was released on: USA: 14 June 2006
There is no definitive answer to how many types of detectives there are. Some police departments have more than others. Some typical types of detectives are homicide, narcotics, cold case, fraud, arson, and cyber crimes.