John Rutledge participated in the Articles of Confederation. He was from South Carolina so he supported the south and all of their decisions. In one of the arguments, he believed that slaves and Whites should be counted together when figuring the population for purposes of representation. When the question was asked: should the nationally legislature have the power to control trade and the slave trade? he was part of the south so he feared that the national legislature might place export duties on their crops, interfere with slave trade, and make commercial treaties favoring the north. He also helped make the constitution and signed it also.
No , they didn't support the Articles because the Articles weakened the US , thus they supported the Constitution
Yes, he was one of the 48 signers.
Anti-Federalists.
Weak describes the Articles of Confederation.
The Articles of Confederation failed to provide for a national judiciary, which was one of its shortcomings. The Articles of Confederation were created in 1777.
1781
the articles of confederation came into existence in 1781-1789.
federalists= supported the Constitution after seeing that the Articles of Confederation were failing anti-federalists= supported the Articles of Confederation and would only support the Constitution if we added a Bill of Rights so we did
The Federalists wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation with the Constitution.
The assembly that replaced the Articles of Confederation was the Bill of Rights.
Yes, the Anti-Federalists were obviously against it, though.
Because the new constitution would give the central government more power then it did under the articles of confederation, and the federalists wanted a government with more power then its states.
The anti-federalists
Anti-Federalists.
federalists
Anti-Federalist
The federalist supported the Constitution and the anti-federalist supported the Articles of Confederation
Federalists
Federalists