no, some supported it and some didn't
English
The colonists were responsible for the Boston tea party.
I know that the loyalists didn't appriciate the Boston Tea Party because the way that they punished the colonists (With the Intolerable Acts)
•The Boston Tea Party was considered successful and a failure because the king lowered taxes but right after it started a war.
The Boston Tea Party was a direct action by the Boston colonists. Boston a town in the British colony of Massachusetts, against the Great Britain Government and the monopolistic East India Company that controlled all the tea imported into the colonies. On December 16, 1773, after officials in Boston refused to return three shiploads of taxed tea to Britain, a group of colonists boarded the ships and destroyed the tea by throwing it into Boston Harbor. The incident remains an iconic event of American history, and other political protests often refer to it.
Boston tea party
Boston Tea Party
After the boston tea party the king taxed all the tea in the colonies.
Boston tea party and stamp act
Boston tea party
the boston tea party
the colonists
No, what are you talking about? The Boston Tea Party was a rebellion of the colonists against England and their taxes.
The Boston Tea Party
The Boston Tea Party was actually not a war. Here is what it was, and what happened. The Tea Act passed. The colonists did not want to pay taxes. So, here is where the Boston Tea Party kicks in, one year after the Tea Act. Here is what you've been waiting for! The Boston Tea Party was an event that was three boats full of colonists. They cut open chests of tea and they dumped it in the Boston Harbor (harr-berr)! The colonists had to pay it off. So, the colonists named that law the Intolerable(in-toll-err-a-bowl) Act. So, the Boston Tea Party was not a war, but it was an event that the colonists responded to the Tea Act.
They did not buy tea.
Boston tea party