A photograph of a statue would be considered a derivative work; if the statue is protected by copyright, you would need permission from the rightsholder to create the derivative work.
the answer to that would be no. the only place it tells you about that is in the book: From the mixed up files of Ms.Basil E. Frankwiller.
I am not a paper conservator, but this is how I've flattened old, curled photographs: Allow the photograph to absorb moisture by exposing it to relatively high humidity (do not use water directly on the print). I only flatten photographs during humid periods in the summer. Once the photograph has absorbed some moisture (allow several days in humid air), it should be more flexible and less resistent to flattening. A dry, curled photograph will resist bending, and the surface will cack easily if forced. Slowly and gently flatten the photograph using your fingers and hands. Potential damage (creases, cracks, kinks) can occur, especially at the print's edges as you press them, so go slowly and carefully. Carefully flatten the photograph and place it under a heavy, flat object. You can use a book for small prints. Place a piece of acid free paper or mat board on both sides of the print. The time to flatten the print will depend; just check it over many days or even weeks or months for the print to relax and flatten.
The best way is to actually have one as a model, a real one or a picture/photograph, and just imitate it. Also, off your memory, if you play an instrument and know what it looks like pretty well.
If you're in the US and still have the old passport book, and meet a couple of other requirements you can apply through the mail. travel.state.gov has all the requirements, instructions and forms. You will need a new photo. Most post office locations that accept passport applications will take your photo for a fee, but call ahead as some require an appointment.
Photographers who are paid for their work, or compose or record images for future profit have their work protected by copyright law. If you hire one to photo or video an event, the professional is the owner of the images. Depending on the deal you have, you will get a certain amount of proofs or images or video files of the event. Any extra copies have to be paid for. For example: you purchase a package that includes photos and a video of your wedding. Only the copies the photographer provides are legal copies. If you start burning extra copies of the wedding video, it is a copyright violation, just like any other video. In the business of creating photography, video, art and prose, among other creations of artistic nature, copyright is implied and automatic. The artist or craftsman is entitled to make money off the creation and not have it wholesaled, unless that was part of the deal. That has to be in writing. A photographer will sometimes sell the rights to a photo or an event like a wedding. To insure your rights, you must get a document from the photographer granting you ownership of the material. All transferred copyrights need documentation. On the other hand the use of your image if it is recognizable in a photograph or video cannot be used for commercial purposes without your permission. In this case the photographer has to get your permission in the form of a document called a "release". You can and should be compensated for such use of your image. In between are many areas that are uncertain and usually unimportant or in some cases exempt. For example if you are in the background of a video or photograph, and are not the subject of the work, it does not count as something that needs to compensated. If you are in a photo or video that is newsworthy, like a protest or meeting that is covered by media, that is also exempt. If you notice you are being recorded in such an event, you must personally notify the photo/videographer if you desire not to be recognized in the image. This must also be in writing.
Names of people are not usually copyrighted. Not usually, but never. To mention someone's name in a book, no permission has to be obtained from an author or from his estate unless his or her private life is discussed or dissected instead of public life. Address of an author or that of his estate will be recorded in any of his books as the copyright holder of that book, where permission, if needed, can be requested.
the width of the Statue of Liberty's book is13ft. and 7in
If a website has it online without permission of the author, the book is stolen. Use the public library that pays the author.
the book on the statue of liberty represents when America had its declaration of independence in July 4,1776
It depends on the poem. Works prior to 1923 (which includes A Heap o' Livin' among others) would be in the public domain, but later materials may require permission.
Unless it is in the public domain books cannot be downloaded free without specific permission from the holder of the copyright.
No, Dominique Francon does not destroy a statue in the book "The Fountainhead." She is a complex character who goes through significant internal struggles, but destroying a statue is not a part of her story.
Yes! Any time you use anybody else's work, you need to cite it, and occasionally ask permission from the person you would like to take the quote or idea from to use in your book (although it would be impossible to get it from Eisenhower himself). If it's a school book that you plan to use for class and not to publish, you can cite the quote off a website/book or simply say, "As Eisenhower would say..."; otherwise, if you plan to publish it, I would talk to your publicist for additional information, because this little thing can turn into a legal issue.
by permission from author and publisher
Not if you write the stage play from the book but you have to cite it as "based on". If you are using someones stage or screen play you need copyright permisssion
No.
Yes