You are using two different verb tenses so it depends on the entire context of the usage, to start with.
That sentence is comparative. It's comparing one location of something to another.
The silly brown cat sat below the bright green tree sweetly singing.The bold-ed words are the adjectives in the sentence. I had no clue what you meant, but i hope this did something for you.
"She fell into a huge cataclysm when her parents knew she stole money." is a poor sample sentence because a cataclysm is not something you can fall into. It is a disaster of huge proportions. "If the Atlantic Ocean suddenly rose 13 feet it would be a cataclysm for those living on the East Coast of the US." would be a better sentence
It depends. A part of speech explains not what the word is, but how the word is used. In fact, the same word can be a noun in one sentence and a verb or adjective in the next. For example:Books are made of ink, paper, and glue.In this sentence, "books" is a noun, the subject of the sentence.Deborah waits patiently while Bridget books the tickets.Therefore, if you plan to patch something, then it is a verb. If you are applying a patch, it is a noun. Additionally, the patch you are applying is in that statement the object of the sentence. Furthermore, if the patch is patching something, then the word is first the subject and then the predicate of the sentence, though subject, object, and predicate are not parts of speech, but rather, the three parts of a sentence. Parts of speechinclude nouns, pronouns, verbs, adverbs, adjectives, participles, conjunctions and interjections.Get it? ;)
It is neither. The word 'from' is a preposition. Example:We have a question from an interested student.The preposition 'from' introduces the prepositional phrase 'from an interested student'; a prepositional phrase tells something more about a noun in the sentence. In this sentence, the prepositional phrase tells more about the noun question (the origin of the question).
Today's youth are deprived of a good education.
something that ends with surrived, deprived, derived...I can't think of any others at the moment....
She was deprived of privileges when she disobeyed her parents. His boss deprived him of his promotion because his work was not up to par. They disobeyed the rules, so the team was deprived of the title.
That depends on what you are correcting and how you are correcting it. If you are editing a paper for someone, then no. Just write the corrections on the paper. If you writing a conversation where a person corrects another person, you should have commas in the dialogue, but they aren't because of corrections, but because they are part of the grammar of dialogue. If someone used the wrong word, you could correct them as so: "You used the word 'depraved,' but I think you meant 'deprived.'" The comma there is necessary, not really because it is a correction, but because it is a compound sentence and you need a comma before a coordinating conjunction.
Taking symbols ´out of context´ of their respective system deprives us of their meaning.
Example: My answer for this question is correct.
Here is the sentence with the corrections: Fay, Carol and Gene went to the mall with their mother.
The (or those) gloves have lain on the bureau all week.
"The grammar is off so you have to make a few grammar corrections," said Tom.
The government teacher handed each senior a diploma, and the superintendent shook each student's hand.
Corrections can be:Why did you give me a bonus?Why did you not give me a bonus?Why didn't you give me a bonus?
Once the stream was diverted the pond was deprived of its inflow of fresh water and rapidly began to stagnate.