The solar neutrino problem relates to the discrepancy between the proportions of the different flavours of neutrinos emitted by the sun in the theoretical model as opposed to experimental measurements. Whilst the sun primarily emitts electron neutrinos, neutrino observatories such as SNO+ detected neutrinos in roughly equal proportions of the three flavours; furthermore the quantity of electron neutrinos detected was less than the theoretically predicted value. Both of these can be explained by neutrino oscillation - in which the neutrinos alter their mass to change their flavour (ie. an electron neutrinos gain mass to change to a muon neutrino). This would also explain the relative lack of electron neutrinos, thus solving the solar neutrino problem!
solar energy from solar panels :) ;)
Venus is the 2nd Planet in Our Solar System. Our Solar System is in The Solar Neighborhood. The Solar Neighborhood is in The Orion Arm. The Orion Arm is on The Milky Way Galaxy.
Before anybody can touch that question, you have to explain what you mean by 'aligned'. Every planet in the solar system is on the same line from the sun that the Earth is on at least once a year. One or two of them do it more than once a year.
Solar is a device which Run from sunlight
solar flares
The problem was that the Sun should output a lot more electron neutrinos then were measured. This meant that the model describing the interior of the Sun would be wrong, but it was working very well in predicting other things. It was finally solved when something called neutrino oscillation was discovered. It turned out that (this might be a bit technical) the interaction state of a neutrino was not equal to its mass or propagation state. In short, this meant that electron neutrino's could become muon or tau neutrino's after a while (and change back again after that). After this people began looking for muon and tau neutrinos coming from the Sun and together with the electron neutrino number they added up to the amount the Solar model predicted. The problem was thus solved; the Sun DOES output more electron neutrino's but some of these change into muon or tau neutrinos before they reach the Earth, and since we were initially only looking for electron neutrinos we missed some.
Yes.
I presume you mean, "What WAS the Solar neutrino problem?"Our understanding of our Sun's core predicted a certain number of neutrinos would hit our Earth per second. Measurements of neutrinos from our Sun were substantially different from this number. The scientists who did the theories said the scientists doing the measurements were wrong; and vice versa -- an argument that went back and forth for forty years.We now know that neutrinos do decay, thus perfectly explaining the lack of neutrinos that are measured as coming from our Sun.The scientists who write the theories are busy trying to explain neutrino decay.
Yes but not at much high level
They capture it by using GA or metal.
At present, no problems. 15 years ago, scientists had no explanation for the small number of solar neutrinos detected at our Earth. Either we didn't understand neutrino formation in our Sun, our detectors were wrong, or neutrinos had the capacity to decay. The latter seemed to be the least likely possibility, so scientists argued for many years which of the first two was correct. In 1998 it was discovered that neutrinos do, indeed, decay into other neutrinos. The reason we weren't seeing as many neutrinos as we expected was because the ones we were expecting to see had decayed into other types. So the solar neutrino problem is no longer a problem.
The smallest member of the Solar System is a dust grain such as a micro-meteoroid. Or if you want to get a lot smaller, then a hydrogen atom. Even smaller, a neutrino from the Sun.
Bradley W. Filippone has written: 'Nuclear physiscs and the calculation of the solar neutrino flux'
Shadows. All eclipses are shadows. A lunar eclipse is the shadow of the Earth on the Moon. A solar eclipse is a shadow of the Moon on the Earth.
Mark Guy Boulay has written: 'A new test of extraction efficiency for the homestake solar neutrino experiment'
That would be difficult to explain. -- The Sun IS a star. -- It IS in my solar system. -- It's the ONLY star in my solar system. -- So the sun is THE star in my solar system.
Isolate planets of the solar system and explain their unique characteristics.