The problem was that the Sun should output a lot more electron neutrinos then were measured. This meant that the model describing the interior of the Sun would be wrong, but it was working very well in predicting other things.
It was finally solved when something called neutrino oscillation was discovered. It turned out that (this might be a bit technical) the interaction state of a neutrino was not equal to its mass or propagation state. In short, this meant that electron neutrino's could become muon or tau neutrino's after a while (and change back again after that).
After this people began looking for muon and tau neutrinos coming from the Sun and together with the electron neutrino number they added up to the amount the Solar model predicted. The problem was thus solved; the Sun DOES output more electron neutrino's but some of these change into muon or tau neutrinos before they reach the Earth, and since we were initially only looking for electron neutrinos we missed some.
The electron neutrinos created in the Sun change into another type of neutrino that we do not detect.
They capture it by using GA or metal.
Muon neutrino was created in 1962.
it means when you have a problem just say how you solved the problem?
They aren't 3 they are in fact 12 if you count anti matter as a separate particle from matter. Electron, muon, tau, electron neutrino, muon neutrino and tau neutrino. The same apply to anti matter positron, anti muon, anti tau, postrin neutrino, anti muon neutrino, and anti tau neutrino.
Atomis bomb.....all that's needed
No
The solar neutrino problem relates to the discrepancy between the proportions of the different flavours of neutrinos emitted by the sun in the theoretical model as opposed to experimental measurements. Whilst the sun primarily emitts electron neutrinos, neutrino observatories such as SNO+ detected neutrinos in roughly equal proportions of the three flavours; furthermore the quantity of electron neutrinos detected was less than the theoretically predicted value. Both of these can be explained by neutrino oscillation - in which the neutrinos alter their mass to change their flavour (ie. an electron neutrinos gain mass to change to a muon neutrino). This would also explain the relative lack of electron neutrinos, thus solving the solar neutrino problem!
Yes.
Yes but not at much high level
They capture it by using GA or metal.
a problem is a conflict or a question and its solved by thinking how u would do fix the problem
greg solved the problem by him cause he retared
Give mGive me an example of a problem you faced on the job, and tell me how you solved ite an example of a problem you faced on the job, and tell me how you solved it
You bring back old memories and try to think of a time you solved a problem. Ask your friends and family about a time you solved a problem and they can help you with that.
I presume you mean, "What WAS the Solar neutrino problem?"Our understanding of our Sun's core predicted a certain number of neutrinos would hit our Earth per second. Measurements of neutrinos from our Sun were substantially different from this number. The scientists who did the theories said the scientists doing the measurements were wrong; and vice versa -- an argument that went back and forth for forty years.We now know that neutrinos do decay, thus perfectly explaining the lack of neutrinos that are measured as coming from our Sun.The scientists who write the theories are busy trying to explain neutrino decay.
The problem of the city to be named "Athens" was solved when it was judged by Zeus.
Kill them