0
What else can I help you with?
The articles of confederation stated the new central government would not go into effect until all thirteen states accepted the proposal The articles were finally ratified in?
The first state to ratify the articles was Virginia, on December 16, 1777. However, some states refused to give up their claim to lands in the West, delaying the process for several years. Maryland was the last to ratify on March 1, 1781.
For how many years were the Articles of Confederation in effect?
The Articles lasted from March 1, 1781, to March 4, 1789 after that the ratification process took place, and the new constitution still used today was set in place.
Is German government democratic or republican?
The modern German government , post Hitler, and Nazism, is a Democratic Republic. The country has a Non-Executive President. (Elected) and a Bundes Chancellor, (Elected) who runs the country on a democratic process .
Were the Nazis democratic?
no, the Nazis believed in strengh, their philosophy was that if you wanted something then you should take it. They did use the democratic process to rise to power and to change the government into a one party system (after they failed to take power by force).
What is an initiative?
A codon that acts as a start signal for the synthesis of a polypeptide.
What is Process of changing Articles of Confederation or constitution?
amend
Can you change the Articles of Confederation?
This question is nebulously worded and can mean one of two questions: 1) Can an individual today change the words/paragraphs/articles of the Articles of Confederation? -- No. The Articles of Confederation is an historical document. 2) Were the Articles of Confederation, while in use, subject to an amendment process? -- Yes. The Articles could be amended provided that the amendment was passed in all of the State Legislatures.
What was the mode of verification or amendment in th articles of confederation?
The Articles of Confederation required unanimous consent from all thirteen states for any amendments to be made. This meant that any proposed change had to be approved by every state legislature, making the process of amending the Articles extremely difficult. As a result, the rigidity of this requirement contributed to weaknesses in the federal government's ability to respond to various challenges. Ultimately, this led to the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, which established a more flexible amendment process.
What was the Ratification process of the Articles of Confederation?
Unlike the later United States Constitution, the Articles of Confederation required that all (then 13) states ratify the agreement before it could be put into effect. The ratification of the Articles of Confederation dragged on for over three years, stalled because many states refused to ratify it until specific conditions were met.
As drafted by the Second Continental Congress the Articles of Confederation established the?
a. process of electing representatives to the Congress. b. three branches of the United States government. c. requirements for being president of the Congress. d. first national government of the United States.
How many states did not vote for articles of the constitution?
Three states did not vote for the Articles of Confederation: Maryland, South Carolina, and New Jersey. These states either refused to sign or did not participate in the voting process. Ultimately, the Articles were ratified in 1781, but the lack of unanimous support highlighted the challenges of creating a cohesive national government.
How did the US Constitution overcome the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and provide for the organization of the new government?
The Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. As a result, a new plan of government, the Constitution, was written to clear up the weaknesses. Under the Articles of Confederation, there were many things the federal government couldn't do. It couldn't tax, make trade treaties, resolve disputes between states, keep order, and pay its debts. To help solve these issues, the writers of the Constitution created a federal government with three branches. Each branch had distinct powers to carry out its responsibilities. Additionally, the government had the ability to create an army. This army could be used to keep order at home as well as fight wars with other countries if needed. The Articles of Confederation can't be criticized for being a weak government because it was set up to be a weak government. However, the Constitution was much better, in part because the writers of the Constitution learned from the past mistakes that were made. They also included an amendment process to correct future problems that might arise. The Constitution was written, in part, to correct the mistakes and resolve the issues that existed in the Articles of Confederation.
How did the us constitution overcome the weaknesses of the articles of the confederation and provide for the organization of the new government?
The Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. As a result, a new plan of government, the Constitution, was written to clear up the weaknesses. Under the Articles of Confederation, there were many things the federal government couldn't do. It couldn't tax, make trade treaties, resolve disputes between states, keep order, and pay its debts. To help solve these issues, the writers of the Constitution created a federal government with three branches. Each branch had distinct powers to carry out its responsibilities. Additionally, the government had the ability to create an army. This army could be used to keep order at home as well as fight wars with other countries if needed. The Articles of Confederation can't be criticized for being a weak government because it was set up to be a weak government. However, the Constitution was much better, in part because the writers of the Constitution learned from the past mistakes that were made. They also included an amendment process to correct future problems that might arise. The Constitution was written, in part, to correct the mistakes and resolve the issues that existed in the Articles of Confederation.
What is the electoral college under the Articles of Confederation?
Under the Articles of Confederation, there was no electoral college as we understand it today. The Articles, which were ratified in 1781, established a weak central government and did not provide for a national executive or president. Instead, states had the authority to select their representatives to the Congress, which lacked the power to enforce laws or levy taxes effectively. The concept of an electoral college was introduced later in the U.S. Constitution, adopted in 1788, to formalize the process of electing the president.
What is the process for voting on the resolutions in congress according to the articles of confederation?
Under the Articles of Confederation, voting on resolutions in Congress required a majority of the states to agree. Each state had one vote, regardless of its size or population, and decisions on most matters needed the approval of at least nine out of thirteen states. This process made it challenging to achieve consensus, often leading to difficulties in passing legislation or making significant decisions. The requirement for supermajority voting contributed to the weaknesses of the Articles and the eventual push for a stronger federal government.
Is while it took 13 states to ratify the articles of confederation only 9 were necessary to ratify the Constitution true or false?
True. The Articles of Confederation required the approval of all 13 states for ratification, while the U.S. Constitution only required the consent of nine states to become effective. This difference allowed for a more streamlined process in adopting the Constitution compared to the Articles of Confederation.
Would meeting was hell to correct the weaknesses of articles of Confederation?
The meeting to address the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, known as the Constitutional Convention of 1787, was indeed a challenging and contentious process. Delegates faced significant disagreements over issues such as state representation and federal authority. However, through compromise and debate, they ultimately crafted the U.S. Constitution, which established a stronger federal government and addressed many shortcomings of the Articles. This meeting was crucial in shaping the future governance of the United States.
