No, a photon is not time travelling
No. A photon is a particle of light. It is massless.
No. Otherwise it wouldn't be a photon.
The photon probably may be the answer. Every time an electron of an atom gets "excited" after gaining energy, it emits a photon to reach, or rather obtain the ground state(energy levels)
ghjfhhftyj
When the electrons in molecules are unable to absorb the energy of incident photon, the photon continues along its path. This happens in the case of glass, even though glass is not 100 percent transparent, as some of the photon energy is absorbed by the glass electrons.
photon diffusion time is the ratio of the total radiant energy contained in the volume of the star to the luminosity of the star
A person moving in the same frame as the moving mirrors would not be able to observe any change in the time it took the photon to travel between the two mirrors. It would not matter if the direction of travel was parallel or perpindicular to the motion of the photon, and this null effect would continue even if the observer was travelling at 99.9999% of the speed of light.
Time Travelling Blues was created on 1999-02-02.
No. The electron is not a photon. An electron is a charged particle of matter. A photon is a unit of "energy-time" designated by Planck's Constant h.
a photon is a photon is a photon
Obeying PhotonsPhotons by definition travel at the speed of light. They are unaffected by mass dilation since they have no mass, but are affected by time dilation: a photon could conceivably travel "forever" from our point of view since no time would pass from a photon's reference frame. So yes, they follow the rules along with everything else.
I have a theory gw+l=gw l=m. If a gravitational warp traps photon then photon have mass. A small amount 0.000000000000000000000000001 mg. That is what i think. ============================================= Until such time as the previous contributor's hunch can be tested in the laboratory, all theory and experiment so far has shown the rest mass of the photon to be zero.
11 hours travelling 60mph or 6.6 hours travelling 100mph ------------------------------------- Answer: time= distance divided by velocity
Lithgow is approximately 140km from Sydney, travelling through Richmond. Alternatively, travelling through Katoomba, it is 142km. Travel time will take well over three hours, depending on what part of Sydney one is travelling to, and the time of day one is travelling. Traffic is very heavy during peak hour.
by travelling and being on time
The energy of a photon is inversely propotional to its wavelength. The wavelength of a blue photon is less than that of a red photon. That makes the blue photon more energetic. Or how about this? The energy of a photon is directly proportional to its frequency. The frequency of a blue photon is greater than that of a red photon. That makes the blue photon more energetic. The wavelength of a photon is inversely proportional to its frequency. The the longer the wavelength, the lower the frequency. The shorter the wavelength, the higher the frequency.
That will depend on lots of things like where in the world you are travelling from, what time of year you are travelling, what days you are travelling, how you are travelling, what class of travel you are using, the age of the kids and other factors.