Some facts can be observed quite directly. For example, water boils at 100 degrees Celsius, under conditions of normal air pressure. This is something that can be easily observed by virtually anone, and does not require expensive equipment or special training, or elaborate mathematical analysis. With water, a stove, and a thermometer, you can verify this assertion. Hence, we can safely say that it falls into the realm of fact rather than personal belief. A personal belief, in comparison, would be something that is a matter of opinion rather than verifiable or easily observable fact. Let us say that orchids are your favorite flower. There is no factual basis upon which to say that one species of flower is necessarily better than another. If someone else prefers roses, they are just as entitled to that opinion as you would be to your opinion that orchids are the best flower. It falls into the realm of personal belief.
The reason why religious disputes remain unresolved after (in some cases) thousands of years, is that religion is not based on verifiable fact, but on personal opinion.
Botany is a natural science because it deals with plants which are natural and not manufactured by humans. In the Dewey Decimal System, it is in the 500s, rather than gardening and agriculture which are an applied science in the 600s. The father of botany was Theophrastus.
David Bromstad's sexual orientation and preferences are personal matters, and he has not publicly defined himself in terms of "top" or "bottom." As a prominent designer and television personality, he is known for his creative work rather than his private life. It's important to respect individuals' privacy regarding their personal relationships and preferences.
No - Accounting is a science. Just as mathematics is. Now, perhaps creative or rather less then straightforward accounting may be considered an 'art' but with no more credibility than a cat burglar considers his singular skill to be.
"Rebecca Rather is not my daughter, but with amazing food like this, we'd claim her as our own any day!"-Dan Rather, former anchor of the CBS Evening Newsfrom reviews of Rebecca Rather's cookbook
These are similar in that their patrons are all passionate in some way about what they do... The religious love their "GOD", scientists love science and artists love art! It could be said that science takes its routes from religion, but has learned to question the world rather than accept a blind faith without reason. Art is all about individual perception and hence takes its origins not only in itself, but in the belief and passion of the artist, I.E science and / or religious belief of some kind. Similarly, science often requires art for visual representations of its components. The three form a symbiotic triangle. All are dependant each other for inspiration, whether they admit it or not. No-one would ever come up with new questions if everyone trusted the same doctrines, and if that were the case then no new answers would ever be found. All three need something to prove or disprove or represent in a new way, and they each find it in one another. The fact that they often dislike each other is unfortunately unavoidable!
None, Norwegians are usually rather rational in that way.
True. Horticulturalists, as foragers, have an ideology of living as part of nature, rather than attempting to control nature. Their belief systems, animism, and shamanism highlight the notion of living with nature.
Yes, a statement can be considered an opinion if it expresses a personal belief or viewpoint rather than a fact that can be proven.
An unfounded belief or notion is a belief or idea that is not based on evidence, reason, or logic. It is typically unsupported by facts, and may be based on misconceptions, misunderstandings, or personal biases rather than objective reality.
This phrase means that science is practical and flexible, based on evidence and experimentation rather than fixed beliefs or principles. It emphasizes the importance of testing and revising theories based on observations, rather than sticking rigidly to a particular belief system.
There is no scientific evidence to suggest that the dead can see the living. This belief is often based on personal or cultural beliefs rather than empirical evidence.
Science is a methodical process of inquiry based on evidence and experimentation, rather than belief or opinion. It is not proven by any individual, but by the collective efforts of the scientific community through rigorous testing, scrutiny, and replication of results.
Robert Goddard was raised in a Protestant Christian household and maintained a belief in Christianity throughout his life. However, he was known for keeping his personal beliefs private, focusing more on his work in rocketry and science. His writings and public statements often reflected a scientific rather than a religious perspective.
Arguments against the existence of heaven often center on the lack of empirical evidence and the reliance on subjective belief systems. Many skeptics point out that concepts of heaven vary widely across cultures and religions, suggesting that it may be a human construct rather than a tangible reality. Additionally, advancements in science and our understanding of the universe challenge traditional notions of an afterlife. Ultimately, beliefs about heaven are deeply personal and can be influenced by individual experiences and cultural contexts.
Heaven is a concept that exists in various religions and belief systems as a place of eternal happiness and peace. Whether or not heaven actually physically exists is a matter of faith and personal beliefs, rather than something that can be proven or disproven scientifically.
There is no scientific evidence to support the idea that the deceased can observe us from heaven. This belief is based on personal or religious beliefs rather than empirical evidence.
There is no scientific evidence to support the idea that the dead can see us from the afterlife. This belief is based on personal or religious beliefs rather than empirical data.