yes
Yes it is.In fact as already available(see,O.P.Misra,J.L.Lavoine(North Holland,1986,p.82)and Misra(2002,Chapt.7)the correct Definition & Structure of Function in the sense of Logic of American Logician Alonzo Church. The answer is Schwartz Distribution & Its Value About A Point(Schwartz Distribution acts globally and not point by point),the measurement taken on Instruments can be errors free. Present Science & Technology are Statistical due to deficiencies in Definition & Structure of Function y=fX). Thereby, we can not forecast any of the Disasters properly. As stated Schwartz Distribution & Its Value About A point do not require Statistics nor Probability.Why Forecasting is not possible? the reason may be Scientists would have to learn 20th centuriy inventions based on 20th century mathematics. This is fact that present system of Science & Technology based on 17th century calculus its essence of the system would disappear. Thereby, Scientists do not want to take/learn latest inventions of 20th century. Therefore, any disaster such as Climate Changes/Earth quakes can not/would not be predicted till Scientists do not adopt new inventions as mentioned. First of all International Union of Mathematics/International Congress of Mathematicians had published about Schwartz's Prize to be awarded at "Oslo" and it has been published on P.1, of Professor Laurent Schwartz,Google.com but now a days it has come on p.5. Can one can believe on such persons those who have not respect to the truth of American Logician Alonzo Church Logic And Schwartz work? These can be hindrance in the forecasting of Disasters as mentioned. If Such Spam would be continued in Science & Technology how the progress may be possible?
One way that Chilean and Italian scientists are trying to predict earthquakes is by the increased levels of radon gasfrom air and water escape routes that form with the moving of the crustal [or lithospheric or tectonic] plates in an earthquake.
there are ways earthquakes can be predicted e.g the love quake,quakes like that goes forwards and backwards and most of the time this type of earthquake is quite "dangerous"
No, there is no way, scientific or otherwise, to predict earthquakes.
it involves the study of seismology. for more info on that go to google.com
Earthquake prediction is currently not possible, as such, seismologists will attempt to quantify the risk posed by a particular fault zone rather than state exactly when an earthquake will occur. For more information, please see the related question.
An oral or written account of previous earthquake activity and location in, near or on the meeting of tectonic or lithospheric plates may serve to predict the location of a future earthquake.
No.
They use a seismograph
Radon (Rn)
one way to predict when a volcano will occur is with the technology scientist use to determine when and where an eruption will occur.
There are many probably earthquake precursors that could lead to useful predictions of when one will occur. Foreshocks are one way to predict when a quake is coming.
seismograph are used to predict an earthquake
Earthquake prediction is currently not possible, as such, seismologists will attempt to quantify the risk posed by a particular fault zone rather than state exactly when an earthquake will occur. For more information, please see the related question.
no
Seismometers work pretty well for measuring them. But there is no true way to predict an earthquake. All methods have not been proven successful
It is impossible to predict when an earthquake will occur.
It is impossible to predict when an earthquake will happen.
Hell yeah we can predict and earthquake
No one can predict the future that specifically; we couldn't even predict the Japanese earthquake last month. The future is full of surprises.
It is 'technically' impossible to predict when an earthquake is going to happen.
An oral or written account of previous earthquake activity and location in, near or on the meeting of tectonic or lithospheric plates may serve to predict the location of a future earthquake.