What is the difference between Ancient Roman architecture and Modern Roman architecture?

Answer 1

ok renaissance art has more depth- it's 3D, uses shadows and perspective more (perspective is when, for example, you draw a table with angled lines to make it look 3D rather that straight lines- then it looks like everything should fall off the table....) renaissance art also focuses more on the induvidiual, their feelings and their struggles. You'll find that authors also begin to focus on feelings in literature. renaissance art depicts more humanistic subjects than the middle ages did, the backgrounds are also more worldly than they had been in the middle ages. Middle ages art is usually flat and religiously related. It's pretty impersonal and symbolic, and other-worldly. also, the scale of Middle ages paintings is strange. The most important person (usually the most powerful religious figure) is the largest, and so on. The proportions of smaller people such as children and infants were off- there were drawn more as smaller adults than as minors.... hope this helps!

Answer 2

4-construction's website published an article which provides interesting information about the main characteristics of Renaissance architecture. It can really help to compare with those of modern characteristics.

Answer 3

There is not much of a difference. We have been inspired by Greek architecture and most of our architectural ideas come form the Greeks. For example, their use of colums, parthenons, and archs. We have also been inspired by their contribution of building material. Such as limestone, marble, and concrete.

By: Janhvi

Answer 4

i think that it depends about the buildings and the way they lived long time ago .. and the technology makes difrencess also .. they didn't have alot of knowledge at that time to make them more smarter than they were .. that's what i think ..

Sorry for my bad English .. :')

By : @7MaiiDaN