There is little direct historical evidence of a King Arthur but historical evidence shows that the most likely source of the legend is from ancient British folk lore. The legend is highly rooted in what is now Great Britain but various facets have been added over the centuries with elements of Baewolf, Adam and Eve, Crusader folk-lore, etc. The legend was around prior to the crusades so the Christian elements were an addition (Quest for the Grail) as was Lancelot and Guenivere.
The core of the folk-lore appears to be the concept of a strong leader bringing together various groups to carve out a perfect kingdom that ultimately fall through the failing of man. Camelot is always an ultimately unattainable\unsustainable ideal.
King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.
Arthur, who became King Arthur
Merlin was King Arthur's tutor when he was a child.
king
A King Arthur is a piercing that is on the tip of a man's penis
yes, the truth is that he was bored so he tried to kill king Arthur.
King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.
King Arthur was king of Britain
king arthur was nice and overprotective
king arthur
The lesson of King Arthur often revolves around themes of chivalry, integrity, leadership, and the search for truth and justice. It emphasizes the importance of honor, loyalty, and the impact of choices on an individual's legacy and the community they serve.
No. There are no records of a King Arthur in England, certainly not in Anglo-Saxon England.
king Arthur's not real
Sir Kay is King Arthur's foster father's son and King Arthur's knight.
King Arthur die in the Battle of the Saxon's
The legends say that King Arthur was killed.
In the legend of King Arthur, Sir Ector is the foster father of King Arthur. He raised Arthur as his own son and played a key role in Arthur's upbringing.