The Tale of King Arthur is based on a military leader who was in power circa 450 AD. Little is known about him other than that he was more of a military leader than a political leader (meaning the title king is probably a misnomer, and something like general would be more appropriate.) He was known to have great fighting skills.
Kin Arthur is a legend, while his story is base in some part on actual British Kings, Arthur never actually existed.
The Mediaeval period is reckoned from the fifth to the fifteenth century. Arthur's time was in the sixth century, at the very beginning of the Middle Ages.
King Arthur's historicity is likely never going to be confirmed or denied, due to lack of evidence from the period. What documents we do have, do mention notable Arthurs in the 5th and 6th century, not necessarily kings. Whether they are the basis of what we know as the folklore figure of today, we can't confirm.
King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.
Arthur Miller was born in New York City in 1915.
nah, most people reckon 13th :D
king arthur live about 22464years ago hello people.
Camelot
camelot
Camelot
paul did you write this
yes
Camelot.
king Arthur was believed to have lived in the 15 century
Camelot
Camelot
He was born in the late 5th Century, the Dark Ages.
2004 sir .