The Tale of King Arthur is based on a military leader who was in power circa 450 AD. Little is known about him other than that he was more of a military leader than a political leader (meaning the title king is probably a misnomer, and something like general would be more appropriate.) He was known to have great fighting skills.
King Arthur's historicity is likely never going to be confirmed or denied, due to lack of evidence from the period. What documents we do have, do mention notable Arthurs in the 5th and 6th century, not necessarily kings. Whether they are the basis of what we know as the folklore figure of today, we can't confirm.
The Mediaeval period is reckoned from the fifth to the fifteenth century. Arthur's time was in the sixth century, at the very beginning of the Middle Ages.
King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.
Arthur Miller was born in New York City in 1915.
nah, most people reckon 13th :D
king arthur live about 22464years ago hello people.
Camelot
camelot
Camelot
paul did you write this
yes
Camelot.
king Arthur was believed to have lived in the 15 century
Camelot
Camelot
He was born in the late 5th Century, the Dark Ages.
There is some controversy as to whether there was ever a real King Arthur at all. Some have found reason to believe that castle/fortress remains found in the area near Salisbury suggest a one-time home for the legendary Arthur, but there is insufficient evidence to point to a true home to King Arthur in the history books. He did live in Camelot though, in the fantasy stories inspired by the potentially true character.