A lens with a focal length of 60mm to 100mm (APS-C sized) are great for macro Photography. An Ultrasonic Motor (USM) is useful in macro photography is it enables quick, quiet and accurate auto focusing. Image Stabilisation is unnecessary in macro lenses.
You could pair this word up with just about anything else except for "camera" (e.g. macro lens/shot/flash/capable/work/setting/photo etc.) To the best of my knowledge, there is no such thing as a "macro camera". If you're trying to determine what macro images are, this definition hails from the old days of film: it is an image where the ratio of the recorded image size to the actual object size is from 1:1 to 10:1. In other words, the image recorded on film is the same size as the object (1:1) or is up to 10x larger than the object. If you go beyond 10:1 you have branched into photomicrography. Anything less than 1:1 is "close up" photography.
It depends on how good of picture quality you want. For highest quality I would get a Canon EOS 1Ds Mark II DSLR Camera along with a Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro Lens. If you can not get very close to your subject you might want to go with a Canon EF 180mm f/3.5 L USM Macro Lens. The best setup would cost around 9,000 to 10,000 dollars. If you do not have a huge budget I would go with a Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi with a Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM lens. Which would run around 1500 dollars. Both setups would give you higher picture quality than of a point and shoot digital camera.
there is only one:photograph objects from extremely close distance although it could be a nice and very expensive paper weight
900 Polaroid film
A telephoto lens would bring a distant image closer.
A dedicated macro lens is the best choice - something like the AF-S Micro-NIKKOR 60mm f/2.8G ED would be a good first macro lens on a D60. A general purpose zoom with a macro setting would be an acceptable second choice. If you have a telephoto lens, you can use it as a macro lens by adding an extension tube. This lets you focus closer than you normally could with that lens, but you can't focus out to infinity with an extension tube. A "smart" tube that will let auto-focus and aperture work is fairly expensive, but still cheaper than a macro lens. Another alternative is to get a reversing ring and put a 50 mm lens on backwards over a medium telephoto lens. This can get you some incredible close-up shots but is tricky to use... you pretty much have to focus by moving the camera.
Canon EOS Rebel XSi Digital SLR with 18-55 mm Lens - Black is the best choice for macro for bug photos.
Yes, a macro lens would be a good start as well as a few other important things to work with to make your photography hobby a success and a pleasure to work with.
Yes, good combination
A Macro 70 sounds like a fixed focal length lens (70mm) capable of close focusing (macro). This type of lens is used to photograph small subjects such as insects and flowers.
A macro lens is used to take photographs of small subjects - a popular use is for photographing insects and foliage.
The 100mm l ,f2.8 is usm macro.$1000.00 on amazon.com
It is far more to do with the lens you use than the camera.
The Opteka 10x HD² Professional Macro Lens is highly rated and only $30 for the Kodak EasyShare.
Yes. The results are better with a macro lens, of course, but it still is not that bad.
A good lens for wildlife photography would be a 100-400mm lens or a similar lens in the range of F/4 or F/5.6. This lens will allow you to get good close up shots without the lens being too big or expensive. But it all depends on what you are photographing as a 100-400mm wouldn't really be capable of macro shots or really distant photos.
Nikon Macro lenses are widely available at electronic stores and camera shops. These macro lenses can be found at stores such as Best Buy, Henry's and Future Shop. These are also available for purchase from Amazon and eBay.