That would be the Bar Scale.
I have never seen linear used on a paint can, but if it is brush paint, you would have to assume a foot wide stripe so that would be 25 sq. ft. If it is a spray can, you would have to see how wide a pattern it has at the distance recommended on the can and figure from there.
To measure a distance on a map that exceeds its length, you can use a piece of string or a flexible measuring tool to trace the route along the map. Mark where the string overlaps and then measure the length of the string using a ruler. Alternatively, if the map has a scale, you can calculate the distance in segments, measuring each segment separately and then summing them up. This way, you can accurately determine the total distance despite the map's limitations.
Rule of thirds? Divide the page into 3 horizontal sections. Background; - right in the distance, everything is very faint and such. Midground; - not right in front of you, not in the distance either, in between. Foreground; - right up close, as if you were standing right behind what ever object it is. I'd imagine good shading over the piece would help alot aswell.
Multiply distance by the scale bar
(Assuming your question is serious) Unfortunately, this question has no real answer. Linear feet is a measure of distance along a single dimension. If you use a tape measure to measure along one wall of your living room, for example, you might measure 20 linear feet. In contrast, square feet is a measure of AREA, and represents a quantity defined by TWO dimensions. If you used a tape measure to measure TWO perpendicular walls of your living room, and if each wall were 20 feet long, the AREA in your living room would be 400 square feet. Your question supposes that linear feet is comparable to square feet. It isn't comparable. It is like asking how many apples are in a basket of oranges? You can't directly compare the two. There are numerous measures of linear distance that can be compared: angstoms, nanometers, microns, millimeters, inches, meters, yards, fathoms, miles, kilometers, light-years, etc. Any of the above linear units may be converted with a little bit of effort and the use of conversion factors you can look up on the web. Similarly, there are many units of area that can be compared: square feet, square inches, square meters, square yard, acres, hectares, square miles, etc. Any of the units of area can be compared with appropriate conversion factors. But you can't convert linear dimensions to area dimensions. They measure different kinds of things. Rod Burrows, PE (Assuming your question is serious) Unfortunately, this question has no real answer. Linear feet is a measure of distance along a single dimension. If you use a tape measure to measure along one wall of your living room, for example, you might measure 20 linear feet. In contrast, square feet is a measure of AREA, and represents a quantity defined by TWO dimensions. If you used a tape measure to measure TWO perpendicular walls of your living room, and if each wall were 20 feet long, the AREA in your living room would be 400 square feet. Your question supposes that linear feet is comparable to square feet. It isn't comparable. It is like asking how many apples are in a basket of oranges? You can't directly compare the two. There are numerous measures of linear distance that can be compared: angstoms, nanometers, microns, millimeters, inches, meters, yards, fathoms, miles, kilometers, light-years, etc. Any of the above linear units may be converted with a little bit of effort and the use of conversion factors you can look up on the web. Similarly, there are many units of area that can be compared: square feet, square inches, square meters, square yard, acres, hectares, square miles, etc. Any of the units of area can be compared with appropriate conversion factors. But you can't convert linear dimensions to area dimensions. They measure different kinds of things. Rod Burrows, PE
Linear distance is basically the distance between two defined points. Think of two pins on a map, and a string being strung from both heads, where the string would follow from one point to another in a perfect line. Hence, linear.
It is the linear distance between the two parallel and identical faces (which are also called the bases).It is the linear distance between the two parallel and identical faces (which are also called the bases).It is the linear distance between the two parallel and identical faces (which are also called the bases).It is the linear distance between the two parallel and identical faces (which are also called the bases).
In The Center Of The Rotating Platform Right At Its Axis You Have No Linear Speed At All, But You Do Have Rotational Speed. Your Rotational Speed would Stay The Same But As You Move Away From The Center Your Linear Speed Gets Faster And Faster. If You Move Twice As Much From The Center Your Linear (Tangential) Speed Would Also Be Twice as Much
You would have a very tough time, because that isn't the formula to calculate work. (distance) divided by (time) is the formula to calculate speed. The formula to calculate work is: (force) multiplied by (distance).
On a linear scale, if two pairs of points are the same distance apart, their magnitudes differ by the same amount. So if distance from point A to B is the same as the distance from point C to D, then the magnitude of B-A is the same as D-C. On a non-linear scale this does not apply. On a logarithmic scale, for example, equal distances, as above would imply that B/A = D/C
The time does affect the distance traveled because the longer you allow something to go, the farther its going to go. the other way around would be the longer you let it to, the longer its going to take. So time DOES affect the distance traveled.
To calculate the velocity of an object, you would typically need two measurements: the distance traveled and the time taken to travel that distance. By dividing the distance traveled by the time taken, you can determine the object's velocity.
A linear model would be most effective to demonstrate the relationship between distance and time, as it represents a constant rate of change over time. The equation can be written as distance = speed * time, where speed is the constant factor.
The answer depends on what information you have been provided with. If you have only the linear dimensions then it is: Length * Breadth * Height
The answer is 200
A telephoto lens would allow you to capture a magnified image from a distance without needing to physically move closer to the subject.
Scientists would use the Doppler Effect to calculate the distance to a Star which had the newly-discovered planet.