answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Earthquakes vary greatly in intensity. Many are not strong enough to cause any notable damage. Additionally, in some earthquake-prone areas the buildings are built to withstand earthquakes, and so are less likely to be damaged.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why all earthquakes are not damaging?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Where are earthquakes more damaging?

in cahokia


Which damaging forces are associated with earthquakes?

aftershocks


What state has the most damaging earthquakes?

California


In what region have damaging earthquakes been concentrated?

in a place


What are the 2 most damaging earthquakes in the Philippine history?

yggjyjgjgj


What is the measurement of how likely an area is to have damaging earthquakes called?

earthquake hazard


What is the measurement of how likely an aresa is to have damaging earthquakes called?

arthquake hazard


What state has second to the most earthquakes?

California next to Alaska, but California's quakes are more damaging.


What natural disaster do volcano bring about?

Volcanoes produce volcanic eruptions and occasionally damaging earthquakes.


Why do earthquakes cause damage?

Earthquakes possess a unique way of damaging structures. Earthquakes vibrate and shake structures, never in just one direction. This chaotic back-and-forth movement is very harmful to architecture.


Does an earthquake-zone level used to assess how likely an Ares is to have damaging earthquakes in the future?

earthquake zone level


What has the author CJ Preclaro written?

C.J Preclaro has written: 'A compilation of damaging earthquakes in the Philippines, 1949-1976'