Even when not yet ratified, the Articles provided domestic and international legitimacy for the Continental Congress to direct the American Revolutionary War, conduct diplomacy with Europe and deal with territorial issues and Native American relations.
they described it as a weakness to some of the governments well to the executive branch the executive branch didnt like the articles of confederation
Basically, it was because not all of the 13 colonies agreed with it, and it didnt it was lacking in some areas, like it didnt have a bill of rights, so when we were under the articles of confederation the government could virtually make up and control our rights.
The articles didn’t reflect anything about the Enlightenment. They were written to keep the states as individuals and not as a whole unit. This is why they didn’t work.
under tha Articles of Confederation, the federal government had little to no power. they could not control taxes and there was no president. The reason was that the early Founders did not want an overly powerful gvt.
slavery, drugs and animals
# The Preamble # The 7 Articles # The 27 Amendments
Chuck Norris laughs at the consitution, and the way thisa question makes no sense
It depends entirely on which consitution is being discussed. In the US Constitution of 1789, there are Seven Articles with numerous subparts. There are also Twenty-Seven Amendments.
The U.S. Constitution The Articles of Confederation was too weak so they scrapped it and wrote the constitution.
because they didnt want people taxing them on supplies
Articles of the Constitution are only amended, they are not removed. All of the original articles are still in the Constitution with the added amendments.
It didnt? The Articles of Confederation were removed almost a century prior to the Civil War.
they didnt like it and grew very angry. But there was nothing they could do to stop the articles from being law.
U.S. consitution
1943
they didnt like it and grew very angry. But there was nothing they could do to stop the articles from being law.
they described it as a weakness to some of the governments well to the executive branch the executive branch didnt like the articles of confederation