answersLogoWhite

0

To pass laws all states need to agree

User Avatar

ALANA STEPHENS

Lvl 2
4y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What was a problem for the national government under the Articles of Confederation?

It was hard to trade with other countries.


What was significance of the Articles of Confederation?

I recommend that you Google search Articles of Confederation. Due to the answer it is very hard to be descriptive and not miss any of the important items.


What was the significance of articles of confederation?

I recommend that you Google search Articles of Confederation. Due to the answer it is very hard to be descriptive and not miss any of the important items.


Why was shay's rebellion hard to stop?

Shay's Rebellion was hard to stop because of the fact that the Articles of Confederation were the guidelines at the time. Under the Articles of Confederation, the government did not have the power to establish an army, hence there was no way army to stop Shay's Rebellion. Instead, the rebellion was stopped by rick folk who paid to form an army.


What is one reason Americans were plagued by hard times under the Articles of Confederation was that Congress could not regulate the type of commerce-trade between states?

I mean that you have the right to vote


What was the significance of the articles of confederations?

I recommend that you Google search Articles of Confederation. Due to the answer it is very hard to be descriptive and not miss any of the important items.


What was the significance of the Articles of Confederation?

Under the Articles of Confederation the American colonists fought and defeated Great Britain and gained independence. By the end of the "Confederation era," Congers had created a bureaucracy to administer the day-to-day affairs of the government. The issue over the western lands was solved under the Articles. The large states holding vast amounts of western land ceded the land to the government under the Articles so that all the states could share in the wealth of those lands. The Northwest Ordinances were passed that provided for the creation of equal, self governing states in the Northwest Territories and the newly created states would have the same rights and privileges as the original 13 states. Congress also provided for a survey of the western lands to prepare the land for sale to all. Under the Articles, the states were held together until a new government under the Constitution was created. The new nation began to emerge as one respecting the ideas that had caused the Revolutionary War in the first place.


Why were the Articles of Confederation thrown out?

the articles of federation gave the states too much power, and the national government lacked the power to tax the states, enforce laws, and judge them. the constitution remedied this, by giving national government more power


How might your life be different now if the US still used the articles of confederation?

Federal government would be a whole lot smaller considering it would not have the power to tax. Also, legislation would be hard to pass since it could only be passed with the unanimous consent of the states. Rights might be abused by the national and state governments since the Bill of Rights was not apart of the Articles.


Why did the delegates draf a new plan instead of revising the articles of confederation?

One of the reasons is that the articles were made so that it was extremely hard to change them. They made a weak decentralized government to maintain the status quo, and for any change to be made to the articles you would need the approval of 9 out of 13 colonies.


How did congress under the Articles of confederation get money to maintain an army and navy?

The main reason the South was having a hard time raising cash to pay the troops was the blockade the North was placing on ships taking cotton to England. Some of the Officers were giving help to the South to pay the troops. Cotton was the main staple of the South.


Was the move from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution legal according to the then in-force Articles?

== == Whether or not the switch from the Articles to the constitution was "illegal" under the Articles is largely irrelevant. For over 200 years, we have chosen to be bound by the current Constitution, not the Articles of Confederation. Our government is bound by the Constitution, and nobody seriously argues that the U.S. government is illegitimate, and that some other, non-existent, government has a rightful claim to power. The fact is, without the support of the people, the Articles of Confederation aren't worth the paper they're printed on, for anything other than a historical curiosity. If every single person in the U.S., from the President, the courts, and Congress, all the way down to you and I, decided that we no longer wanted to live under the Constitution, because somebody has come up with a better idea, who would stop us? Would it technically be "legal" to scrap the constitution and start from scratch? That's hard to say, but at that point, it wouldn't really matter, would it? The move from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution was, in fact, illegal according to the government of the time. The Annapolis convention was called in 1786, but only 12 delegates (5 states) showed up. Alexander Hamilton recommended meeting again the year after. Then, in May 1787, 55 delegates (from 12 states...not RI) met in Philadelphia. They met in total secrecy. Source: The American Pageant ed.12 Houghton Mifflin Co.