very interesting question, we don't know why. however there are several lines of evidence from studying other particles in the standard model that suggest that there cannot be more than 6 quarks.
I am sure there are hadrons containing top quark(s), but they have not been observed. The things preventing the observation of such hadrons are:one top quark by itself has roughly the mass of an entire tungsten atom, this means it takes an enormous amount of energy just to create just one top quarkthe top quark is very unstable with a halflife of about 5E-25 seconds, this means that for all practical purposes all top quarks created will be gone within only about 25E-25 seconds so they are very unlikely to even have a chance to find other quarks to form hadrons with and if they did form a hadron it would decay rapidly
The word 'Scientists' is the plural of the noun 'Scientist'. So no, it is not an adjective.
The two Subatomic particles which are in the Nucleus of an Atom is the Up and Down quark. When we think about the Nucleus of an Atom it is made up with Neutrons and Protons. Both Neutrons and Protons are made up with Quarks (a type of Subatomic Particle) Neutrons have to Down quarks and one Up quark. Whilst Protons have two Up quarks and one Down quark. So we can see that the Nucleus of an Atom is not only made up but dependent on Up and Down quarks.This should answer the Question.
Definatly not! A Neutron is a kind of Baryon (a type of Hadron) made up of the subatomic particles: Up quark, Down quark and Electrons. Now a Neutrino is different, there are three different types. There are Electron Neutrinoes, Muon Neutrinoes, and Tau Neutrinoes. Neutrinos are a type of Lepton, for every Neutrino there is a equivalent non-neutrino. For example, There is an Electron and an Electron Neutrino. So to conclude Neutrino does not mean Neutron, instead it is describing a type of Lepton. This should answer the Question.
Understanding that this question is the same as asking "why do we have one moon?" or "why does hydrogen have one proton" might help you reconsider what it is you are trying to ask. It is what it is. Asking "why" is a philosophical question to which no one would know the answer... Here i just wana say that as we know that a proton and a neurtron can be further subdivided into quarks which are the building blocks of hadrons(i.e Proton and neutron etc), there are six quarks ,however a proton is made of only 3 quarks , two up quarks and one down quark.. value for up quark is 2/3 for down quark value is -1/3 so mathematically, 2/3*2 = 4/3 4/3-1/3=3/3= 1 a positive plus charge on proton FOR neutron same process as above.. but for an electron we cant calculate it in the way like for proton and neutron. so we have to just accept it in the way as it is..just like some planets of our universe are big and some are small..so we cant say that why these are... however Quantam mechanics is still on working for this...REGARDS
Because they needed to produce a collision with an energy around 200 GeV, the top quark's rest mass, to pop it into existence. There are currently only two accelerators in the world that can do this, the LHC at CERN and the Tevatron at Fermilab. As a point of reference, a mass of 200 GeV/c2 is about 200 times more massive than a proton.
A quark is what makes up the nuetrons and protons of an atom. So yes, it could be counted as part of an atom.
The six quark flavors are up, down, strange, charmed, bottom, and top. The top quark was the last to be created in an accelerator since its mass was so great; after a nearly 20 year search it finally was announced by Fermilab.
because God want him to sacrifice his son so he find difficult
The nature of a scientist is to figure out answers to problems, help find cures for diseases, and so on.
Sometimes in Science you will have to measure things and/or you will have to find the average. So basically that's what math has to do with being a scientist.
there are scientist from a to z but we can't find them yet for yo, you have to find them on your own thenn so well then by see ya later then buddy but if you can find them let me now how many are there talk to you later then
We have a debate in science and our group scientist is Archimedes. Our opponent's scientist is Karl Landsteiner. We have to prove why our scientist is better than the other scientist and i can't find anything on it. For anyone who is willing to help, thank you so much.
It is difficult bacause they have no vehical to go, so they have to walk. B
I don't know. Does it look like I am a scientist? No. I'm not a scientist so don't come up here asking me these dumb questions. Ask a scientist this question if you want to know so bad. OK? Thank you and goodnight!
Yes, the down quark is slightly heavier than the up quark. However, the difference in mass between a neutron and a proton is not solely due to the difference between the down and up quarks. Other factors, such as binding energy and contributions from virtual particles, also play a role in the mass difference between the two particles.
Nobody did/ Different people find different things difficult. So what you might find difficult someone else might find easy. And, what someone else finds difficult, you might find easy. As a result, there is no hardest type of mathematics and so nobody could have invented it.