They had enough strong government under the british
true
In the articles of confederation, congress could not force states to provide soldiers for an army, this made it more difficult to protect its citizens against foreign threats. Congress tried to make an agreement with spain about keeping the Mississippi river, however it was not ratified, if the us had a strong military, Spanish might have negotatiaged.
D: Equal Representation for all states in the Congress
false
The distaste of the states for strong central authority
Congress was it.
The Articles of Confederation did not have a president and no strong central government.
The Articles of Confederation were weak and did not even give a semi-strong Government.
The Articles of Confederation showed that people feared a strong government similar to the monarchy in Britain.
No. The confederation created by Articles of Confederation was designed to have a weak central government and a strong state government.
The idea that a strong central government threatens the rights of the people and of the states was a major influence on the authors of the Articles of Confederation.
Revise the Articles of Confederation
The national government did not have the power to tax. It did not have the power to enforce laws. Congress lacked strong and steady leadership.
the people needed a strong country
true
C. The articles of Confederation did not provide for a strong enough-
The Articles of Confederation created a weak central government. The Constitution created a strong central government. The Articles did not create an executive branch. Congress was a unicameral legislature. There was no federal court system under the Articles. Congress could not enforce the laws nor levy and collect taxes without the approval of the states, under the Articles. A major weakness under the Articles was its lack of power to regulate trade between the states and with foreign nations.