Until observations and experiments conflict with the theory
The Big Bang theory is the prevailing explanation for the beginning of the universe. It posits that the universe began as a singularity around 13.8 billion years ago and has been expanding ever since. This theory is supported by evidence such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the observed redshift of galaxies.
Many scientists accept the Big Bang Theory as the leading explanation for the origin of the universe. This theory posits that the universe began approximately 13.8 billion years ago from an extremely hot and dense singularity and has been expanding ever since. Evidence supporting this theory includes the cosmic microwave background radiation and the observed redshift of distant galaxies. The Big Bang Theory provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the evolution of the universe over time.
One currently accepted theory of the Moon's creation is that it was ejecta from the earth after an impact with an asteroid or comet.
opponent-process theory
A scientific theory is developed through a systematic process that begins with observations and hypotheses. Researchers conduct experiments and gather data to test these hypotheses, ensuring that their findings are reproducible and reliable. Over time, as evidence accumulates and withstands scrutiny, a hypothesis may evolve into a theory that offers a comprehensive explanation of a phenomenon. Peer review and ongoing experimentation further refine and validate the theory within the scientific community.
A theory can offer explanation for an observed phenomenon that is supported by extensive data.
a scientific theory is a description of an observed phenomenon while a scientific theory is an explanation of an observed phenomenon
A scientific theory is an accepted and universally true explanation of observed facts that is based on evidence, tested through experimentation, and widely accepted by the scientific community.
A Guess...!
Both a hypothesis and a theory offer an explanation of some observed phenomenon. The difference is that a hypothesis must have confirmation to become a theory.
A law is the description of an observed phenomenon. It doesn't explain why the phenomenon exists or what causes it. It doesn't change. A theory is the explanation but those can and do change.
An accepted explanation of facts is a commonly agreed interpretation or theory that provides a logical and substantiated framework for understanding a set of observed phenomena. It is based on empirical evidence, analysis, and consensus within a particular field of study or community of experts.
Theory
In scientific research, a hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon based on limited evidence, while a theory is a well-established and widely accepted explanation that has been extensively tested and supported by evidence.
A theory is a widely accepted explanation based on experimental results.
law and theory
A theory is more accepted than a hypothesis because it is a well-substantiated explanation of a phenomenon based on scientific evidence, testing, and broader consensus among experts. Theories undergo rigorous testing and scrutiny, whereas a hypothesis is a proposed explanation that has yet to be fully tested or proven.