Space probes are not piloted. Probes are launched to places that are months or years away in travel time. A pilot would require too much food, air, and water.
Sending space probes is cheaper than sending people to other planets because space probes are typically smaller, lighter, and require less infrastructure to support life support systems and return missions. Human missions have to account for the safety, health, and well-being of the astronauts, resulting in significantly higher costs. Additionally, space probes can be designed for specific tasks and don't require return trips, whereas human missions would need to account for the return journey.
The Sun is the only place they can get energy in interplanetary space. It would be impossible at the moment to send them with enough fuel reserves to do everything we want them to.
I think it might be because probes are cheaper and just in case something goes wrong, it would not end up resulting in loss of life. (Just an opinion though.)
we can learn many things from unmanned space probes, they can tackle tough terrains and function without air or lots of food, they can last long periods of time in space and don't get old.. for some space missions it can take years to get there for instance it would take 3 years to get to our closest neighbour mars..
Space probes without crew can be more cost-effective, smaller, and lightweight compared to manned spacecraft. They can gather scientific data in extreme space environments, such as outer reaches of the solar system, where sending humans is currently not feasible. They also eliminate the risks associated with human spaceflight, allowing for longer missions and more sophisticated scientific studies.
Space probes would be safer.
pros: We can learn lots of things by sending crews and space probes. For without space probes how would we be able to tell the weather. cons: Many humans can die in space if there is a problem with the space craft and billions of dollars will be wasted.
That would be several hundred, perhaps even several thousand, probes for each of the countries - no sense to list them all here.
Space probes like New Horizons have only performed flybys of Pluto because it is very far away from Earth and the journey would require a significant amount of time and resources. Additionally, the spacecraft would need to carry enough fuel for the long journey and for entering Pluto's orbit, which adds complexity and cost to the mission.
Sending space probes is cheaper than sending people to other planets because space probes are typically smaller, lighter, and require less infrastructure to support life support systems and return missions. Human missions have to account for the safety, health, and well-being of the astronauts, resulting in significantly higher costs. Additionally, space probes can be designed for specific tasks and don't require return trips, whereas human missions would need to account for the return journey.
by sending space probes to space like the mars rover helps us understand the climate, etc. so when we get there we know what were dealing with and where to land
Telescopes, probes, and basically anything else someone would use to study outer space.
The Sun is the only place they can get energy in interplanetary space. It would be impossible at the moment to send them with enough fuel reserves to do everything we want them to.
no there is no point it is to hot remember it the closes planet to the sun they would just melt
I think it might be because probes are cheaper and just in case something goes wrong, it would not end up resulting in loss of life. (Just an opinion though.)
Space probes don't need air, water, food, sanitary facilities, or tightly controlled limits of temperature, acceleration, and exposure to radiation. They also don't need to be returned to earth.
FAR.it would probaly be in the googels it takes about 5-6 years.Acording to how long junos gonna travel.