Yes, generally the hottest main sequence stars are also the most massive. This is because more massive stars have higher core temperatures and pressures, resulting in hotter surface temperatures. Therefore, there is a direct correlation between a star's mass and its surface temperature on the main sequence.
There is no simple relation. The color does not depend only on the mass. The same star can change color, without a significant change in mass. For example, our Sun is currently yellow; in a few billion years, it is expected to get much larger, becoming a red giant. However, if we limit the sample of stars to those on the "main sequence" of the "HR diagram", there is something of a relation between mass and color. The most massive stars are blue or white. They are also hottest and most luminous. The least massive are the red dwarf stars, which are relatively cool and dim. Our Sun, which is a "main sequence" star at present, is somewhere in between those extremes. (There is a strong relationship between mass and luminosity for main sequence stars. The HR diagram, of course, shows there is a relationship between luminosity and color for the main sequence stars.)
A main sequence star is NOT a TYPE of star but a period in a stars evolution. Therefore all stars from the hottest to the coolest are on the main sequence at some stage - with the exception of brown dwarfs which do not reach the main sequence.
There is only one star in the solar system that is the sun. So to answer your question the sun is. The sun is a main sequence star also. The hottest stars are blue/white ones followed by stars like our own than the coolest stars are red ones
Stars are classified by the H-R scale. They are classified by their luminosity and their temperature. They can also be classified by stage; our sun is a main sequence star while the center of the milky way is a black hole(the corpse of a super massive star).
Yellow stars are the second hottest, Blue stars are the first hottest. Red stars, even though they are they can be the biggest they are the coldest type of star, they are still hot, but not as hot as compared to other stars.
There is no specific name of such stars. In stellar models they are given the classification of O-type main sequence stars.
The Fibonacci sequence starts with 1 and 1. However any sequence in which the first two terms are given and the rest are defined recursively as t(n) = t(n-2) + t(n-1), with n = 3, 4, ... is also known as a Fibonacci sequence. Note the "the" and "a" preceding Fibonacci sequence.
There is no simple relation. The color does not depend only on the mass. The same star can change color, without a significant change in mass. For example, our Sun is currently yellow; in a few billion years, it is expected to get much larger, becoming a red giant. However, if we limit the sample of stars to those on the "main sequence" of the "HR diagram", there is something of a relation between mass and color. The most massive stars are blue or white. They are also hottest and most luminous. The least massive are the red dwarf stars, which are relatively cool and dim. Our Sun, which is a "main sequence" star at present, is somewhere in between those extremes. (There is a strong relationship between mass and luminosity for main sequence stars. The HR diagram, of course, shows there is a relationship between luminosity and color for the main sequence stars.)
The Fibonacci sequence is named after the Italian mathematician Leonardo of Pisa, who is also known as Fibonacci. He introduced the sequence to the Western world in his 1202 book "Liber Abaci," although the sequence itself had been previously described in Indian mathematics. The sequence starts with 0 and 1, with each subsequent number being the sum of the two preceding ones.
It's not just a keyword, it is also an operator in instance creation. This operator starts the sequence of constructing a new instance of object.
A main sequence star is NOT a TYPE of star but a period in a stars evolution. Therefore all stars from the hottest to the coolest are on the main sequence at some stage - with the exception of brown dwarfs which do not reach the main sequence.
There is a reason its called Death Valley. The hottest day ever there is also the hottest temperature ever recorded on Earth-- 134 degrees in 1913.
well the troposphere is made up of different layers and the hottest part is the centre which is also known as the astehenosphere
There is only one star in the solar system that is the sun. So to answer your question the sun is. The sun is a main sequence star also. The hottest stars are blue/white ones followed by stars like our own than the coolest stars are red ones
Yes. The larger or more massive a star is, the faster it has to "burn" hydrogen to stay in Hydrostatic equilibrium.The largest stars, known as population III stars (Formed about 400 million years after the big bang) were massive and used up all of the available hydrogen in millions of years.Our Sun, is not so massive, so will stay on the main sequence for about 10 billion years. Part of this, is not due to it's mass, but also because of the metallicity or the metals within it. This "slows" down the rate of nuclear fusion.
California has several deserts, but the High Desert, where Death Valley is located is by far the hottest. It is below sea level and frequently the hottest location in North America let alone California.
The pressures from surrounding material is so intense that despite the high temperatures, the metals of the inner core cannot melt.