No two astronomers (secular) agree on the origin of any matter. However Creation scientists agree that God created everything ex-nihilo (from nothing). Science continues to try and see beyond what they refer to as the big bang. However their techniques they use in order to track back that far into history supposedly bring them to what they believe to be .1111 (or something) seconds after the big bang. Secular Science has been baffled by "the beginning of the universe" for years because they have no solid evidence on which to base their findings. Everything is postulated and supposedly correct all so they can continue to move forward even if it is in the wrong direction. A beginning based on The Bible's account found in Genesis 1 is the only feasible story about the creation of our known universe. And by feasible, I mean the only source that can be trusted for absolute truth.
Some fallacies for you to look into regarding an evolutionary point of view on the beginning of the world would in the fossil records including carbon dating (newly created rocks from active volcanoes being dated millions of years old using carbon dating even though their creation was observed in a much shorter span of time.) And also evolutionary records having no physical proof of any species (not just human) evolving from one kind to another (such as lizard to bird which is constantly portrayed by attempts of artist renderings on dinosaurs as certain ones having feathers.)
I encourage you to research this yourself. Realize that Evolution is still called "The THEORY of Evolution". Find out for yourself which stories of creation can actually hold up against a valid argument. You can start at answersingenesis.com Though it is a Christian site they do not simply throw scripture at you to prove their point they actually approach each issue with practised science and give straight answers.
Another view
The misinformation above is staggering in its ignorance.
Evolution is a fact, recognised not only by secular scientists but also by organised religions, including the Catholic church. The theories concerned are the reasoned attempts to explain the process. Failure to see the difference show a lack of intellectual capacity and rigour.
In addition there is evidence of the big bang, both physical and theoretical. One theory has the capacity to describe the universe at 10-43 seconds after the big bang (not .1111 or something). There is no evidence whatsoever for the creation of the universe by a deity.
It is indeed fortunate that the vast majority of people that hold strong spiritual beliefs have a little more integrity and scepticism than the views of fundamentalist above. (Those views are, perhaps, proof that evolution is not universal in all cases)
People used to believe the earth was flat, well some of us have learned a thing or two since then, even if others find that difficult.
Earth and Mars are the only planets known to have polar ice caps. Yes, I agree. However there is a possibility that Mercury has some ice in deep craters at the poles.
According to the Solar Disruption Theory, there was a time in the past when the Sun and a big star almost collided in space. This led to a disturbance in space which caused some parts of the Sun to burst. The torn pieces from the Sun became the planets.
The first subsystem would be the super cluster, or clusters of galactic groups. After that would be groups, such as our local group of galaxies. The galaxies would be the next level. Within a galaxy are numerous globular clusters of stars, and random stars (and binary and ternary pairs) orbiting the disk (for spiral galaxies). There are various types of galaxy. Each star may be orbited by zero or more planets, belts of asteroids, and/or comets, forming a solar system. Each planet may have a ring of debris and/or moons. Some of these moons may have satellites of their own, though I am not aware of any such in our solar system.
As Pluto, a dwarf planet, is no longer counted as a planet, there are now only 8 known planets in our solar system.It remains to be seen if the discovery of extra-solar planets affects how we classify objects within our solar system. Several hundred likely planets have been detected orbiting other stars, with the possibility that there are other solar systems like our own. By late 2011, a total of 599 exoplanets had been identified and another 1235 were pending corroboration.Status of PlutoPluto is a dwarf planet in the solar system and the prototype of a yet-to-be-named family of Trans-Neptunian objects. From its discovery in 1930 until 2006, it was considered the ninth and smallest of the planets of the Solar System, both by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) and the general public. After much debate, the IAU decided on August 24, 2006 to reclassify Pluto as a dwarf planet, requiring that a planet must "clear the neighborhood around its orbit." Further observations may also affect the definition of Charon as a moon of Pluto, possibly the classification of the two as a binary planet.
they agree to destroy Odysseus and his crew
No. It was categorised as a dwarf planet in 2006, but not all astronomers agree with that decision.
the mass cannot decrease as we cannot take atoms out of matter .if i agree that scientists remove still i don't agree that matter will reduce .
No in my opinion its not
lun
All I know is that I will have to when it happens no matter what it is.
If this is from Florida Focus, and in general terms, Modern astronomers would suggest the Sun is not the exact center of the Solar System, but would agree that the Sun is not revolving around Earth.
There are different opinions about this. One is that there is no reason to agree with GMO foods.
No, I don't agree that the girl is going to lose no matter what she does. Girls can win just as easily as boys if they try hard and give it their best shot.
If the parties agree to everything that needs to be addressed by the court then the matter is uncontested. If there is any disagreement and the parties are asking the court to resolve the issues for them then the matter is contested.If the parties agree to everything that needs to be addressed by the court then the matter is uncontested. If there is any disagreement and the parties are asking the court to resolve the issues for them then the matter is contested.If the parties agree to everything that needs to be addressed by the court then the matter is uncontested. If there is any disagreement and the parties are asking the court to resolve the issues for them then the matter is contested.If the parties agree to everything that needs to be addressed by the court then the matter is uncontested. If there is any disagreement and the parties are asking the court to resolve the issues for them then the matter is contested.
Most of them and as a matter of fact, most people in the world also agree.
It does not matter that others agree or disagree. If those are the rules then they have to be adhered to.
Cows milk generally does not agree with dogs.