by sending probes to the planets one will come back from Pluto in about 4 years
this is because they are trying to see if there is life on differant planets
Scientists come up with models by trying to find a mathematical description of some phenomenon, which will give predictions that can be verified experimentally.
they are trying getting enough feul. they want more things to know about mars before they just go. that is why they are waiting at least until 2012 to go to mars.
yes they will cos scientists are trying to find water on it do people can live there in thousands of years time when the earth gets desroyed by global warming .
The first discoveries of extra-solar planets were made by looking for a slight wobble in the motion of the star. In the last couple of years, scientists have been able to detect the change in the spectrum of a star as a planet passes in front of it, and be able to analyze the atmosphere of that planet.
Most scientists are not trying to capture Bigfoot. Until concrete evidence is found, it is unlikely that a large-scale trapping effort will occur.
Scientists are trying to understand the universe in which we live, in considerable detail.
Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered, and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest, fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time trying to prove it.
Scientists are often trying to find out whether certain factors changed or remained the same.
Yes, forensic scientists solve crimes all the time.
No.
Alfred Weneger was trying to prove his theory of Continental Drift. Many other scientists before him had the same theory, but they never could prove it. He had five pieces of evidence.
Clarification needed: evidence for what? What proposition are you trying to support?
If you browse around this category, you will find several similar questions with replies that answer your query. ==================================== Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered, and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest, fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time trying to prove it.
Scientists are trying to figure something out.
that's what scientists are trying to find out..
Scientists are trying to. there trying to bring the wolly mammoth