The major difference is that a low-mass star lives much longer. The reason for this is that a high-mass star gets hotter, is much brighter, and uses up its fuel much faster. The difference can be quite dramatic, with some stars being millions of times brighter than others.
Also, assuming the star doesn't acquire additional mass, a low-mass star will end up as a white dwarf, while more massive stars will end up as a neutron star, or in the case of the most massive stars, a black hole.
The key element that indicates a star is living a high mass life cycle is the presence of heavier elements such as carbon, oxygen, and eventually iron in its core. High mass stars undergo fusion processes that produce these heavier elements during their relatively short lifetimes. In contrast, low mass stars primarily fuse hydrogen into helium and may only produce lighter elements before they evolve into red giants and shed their outer layers, leaving behind white dwarfs. The ability to create and sustain fusion of heavier elements is a hallmark of high mass star evolution.
The life cycle of a star is determined primarily by its mass. The hotter a star the bluer its color. The difference between apparent brightness and luminosity is that luminosity is a good indicator of the energy output of a star.
The life cycle path of a star is determined by its initial mass. Higher mass stars have shorter life spans and end in violent supernova explosions, forming neutron stars or black holes, while lower mass stars like the Sun evolve into red giants and eventually shed their outer layers to form planetary nebulae.
It is the stage at which the gravitational collapse of a swirling mass of dust and gases reaches a critical mass at which sustained thermonuclear process begins.
Formation of the star out of a giant cloud of gas and dust.
A high-mass star will use up its fuel faster than a low-mass one. Depending on the amount of mass that remains at the end of its life, it may convert to a neutron star, or to a black hole.
None at all/ The life cycle of a star is based on it's initial mass, not where it was formed.
The stage that comes first in the life cycle of a high-mass star is the main sequence stage. During this stage, the star fuses hydrogen into helium in its core, maintaining a balance between radiation pressure and gravity.
The more the mass the shorter their life cycle (the more quickly they use their fuel)
The Sun is a medium mass star in main sequence.
The major difference is that a low-mass star lives much longer. The reason for this is that a high-mass star gets hotter, is much brighter, and uses up its fuel much faster. The difference can be quite dramatic, with some stars being millions of times brighter than others. Also, assuming the star doesn't acquire additional mass, a low-mass star will end up as a white dwarf, while more massive stars will end up as a neutron star, or in the case of the most massive stars, a black hole.
its mass
high mass has shortest life (stars right?)
mass
The key element that indicates a star is living a high mass life cycle is the presence of heavier elements such as carbon, oxygen, and eventually iron in its core. High mass stars undergo fusion processes that produce these heavier elements during their relatively short lifetimes. In contrast, low mass stars primarily fuse hydrogen into helium and may only produce lighter elements before they evolve into red giants and shed their outer layers, leaving behind white dwarfs. The ability to create and sustain fusion of heavier elements is a hallmark of high mass star evolution.
The life cycle of a star is determined primarily by its mass. The hotter a star the bluer its color. The difference between apparent brightness and luminosity is that luminosity is a good indicator of the energy output of a star.
How does what differ from mass?