The key element that indicates a star is living a high mass life cycle is the presence of heavier elements such as carbon, oxygen, and eventually iron in its core. High mass stars undergo fusion processes that produce these heavier elements during their relatively short lifetimes. In contrast, low mass stars primarily fuse hydrogen into helium and may only produce lighter elements before they evolve into red giants and shed their outer layers, leaving behind white dwarfs. The ability to create and sustain fusion of heavier elements is a hallmark of high mass star evolution.
An abiotic carbon cycle refers to the movement of carbon through non-living components of an ecosystem, such as the atmosphere, oceans, and soil. This cycle involves processes like photosynthesis, respiration, and decomposition that exchange carbon between the atmosphere, water, and soil without the involvement of living organisms.
Diurnal cycle
NO!!!! Because atmospheric nitrogen is fixated into plants. Thereby by anaimal comsumption nitrogen is ingestied into animals and humans. Human being would have no strength, because nitrogen is a vital element in proteins. There are several bio-chemical cycles. They Are'- Nitrogen Cycle Oxygen Cycle Carbon Cycle. Phosphorus Cycle With out these cycles biology would NOT function.
It would be about 29.5 earth days. Or, precisely the same length of time as a full cycle of moon phases.
if there were no clouds there would be no water for humans to servive in or any living animals or plants or nothing we need water for many things. clouds are very well related to weather they colect water from the ocean witch is evaporation then when they get really fat they let all the water out of the clouds witch is called a cycle.
The most important element in the water cycle is water itself. Without it, the water cycle would not exist.
The most important element in the water cycle is water itself. Without it, the water cycle would not exist.
Long term, no. All living things are a part of the biosphere and the great cycle this encompasses. Without the other organisms that form part of this cycle, a living thing would eventually die.
the back bone of life is carbon and with out it you would run out and all living things would die.
Living things would eventually run out of carbon and would cease to exist. All living beings require carbon from their environment to survive.
Neon is chemically inert. It doesnt react with any other element and (to the best of my knowledge) has no role in living things. So I would comment that the element neon is not found inside living things.
Dead material would accumulate to choke out livable habitat. Basically, there would be dead organisms and animal waste piled up everywhere!
The main features water cycle would still exist if there was no life on earth, however the carbon cycle (as we know it) is dependent on life.
Every living organism is related to the Carbon Cycle. Herbivores would be related to the carbon cycle because they breathe in air, and breathe out carbon dioxide (CO2).
The most common element found in all living things is not, as you would think, oxygen. It is carbon an can be found in every living organism. That is why organic material gives of Carbon and Oxygen as it rots or burns.
If you ment A living organism, then no it isn't. But I'm sure you ment in living organisms. Then yes, it is an important element found in most organisms and is used for a great range of functions. One example would be pH regulation in the blood, or any other liquid.
very good. if it wasn't for it all living organisms would cease to exist.