Two protons race around a ring. The rings are about the size of garden hoses. The protons trajectory is curved by supercooled magnets to keep the beams from cutting through the tube and magnets like a blowtorch. These protons are super charged and are traveling 99% the speed of light. The paths of the protons will collide. It is trying to re-create dark matter.
clear
A circle.
A star that burns hydrogen quickly would generate more light than one that burns it slowly. This is because a faster fusion rate produces more energy in a shorter period, resulting in a higher luminosity. In contrast, a star that burns hydrogen slowly would have a lower energy output, leading to dimmer light. Therefore, the rate of hydrogen fusion directly impacts the star's brightness.
That would be the hydrogen in the sun. The second most plentiful substancein the solar system would be the helium in the sun, being the fused hydrogen.
No. The sun's energy comes from the nuclear fusion of hydrogen, not combustion. In this reaction hydrogen atoms fuse with one another to form helium atoms. The fusion of hydrogen yields about 4.5 million times more energy than you would get from burning the same amount.
I would say a lawn mower is a machine that cuts grass.
Input: Dirty clothes, water, detergent. Output: Clean clothes.
2 molecules of hydrogen bond with 2 molecules of oxygen which yields 4 molecules of hydrogen and 2 molecules of oxygen
Linguistic robots called Chatterbots (such as Jabberwacky) are very popular programs that allow an individual to converse with a machine and demonstrate machine intelligence and reasoning.
Before this question may be answered properly, it must be more specific. For example, the Large Hadron Collider is in Europe. Do you mean to ask whether the founding fathers (which assumes that they all agreed on everything) would have approved the Large Hadron Collider if: ... It had been built in the United States of America; ... using public funds?
The chemical that you describe looks like slightly hydrogenated coal. No petroleum derived hydrocarbon would have so few hydrogen atoms. With the addition of another 12 hydrogen atoms, you would have a hexane molecule.
Highly unlikely that the machine will attract any form of extraterrestrial beings. If anything the planet would attract said hostile beings rather than it's technology
A water molecule has a single Oxygen atom bound to two Hydrogen atoms at approximately 120o. Think of Mickey Mouse's head - his face would be the Oxygen atom, and his ears would be the Hydrogen atoms.
Well that would be the Earth it's self. But the biggest man made magnet is, The Large Hadron Collider in France/Sweden. It is 17 miles in circumference and is a particle collider.
Plain and simple: no. Is there any intelligent reason to think that it would?
To make a wormhole that would serve as a time machine, you would need a massive amount of energy, a collider, and imploder, an inflator and a differentiator. The collider would accelerate the nuclei of atoms and make them collide. When the nuclei smash into each other their protons and neutrons are pulverised, creating quark-gluton plasma. The quark-gluton plasma needs to be imploded somehow with about 10 billion joules. This would create a minute wormhole. The inflator would enlarge the wormhole by feeding it with exotic matter. Its anti-gravity would push the throat of the wormhole outwards. Then the differentiator would create a permanent time difference between the two ends. This could be done by exposing one end to intense gravity from a neutron star or spinning one mouth close to the speed of light. Then one could jump through one end, and go backwards or forwards in time.
The Turing test uses a human judge engaged in remote conversation with two parties: another human and a machine. If the judge cannot tell which party is the human, the machine passes the test.