Diurnal cycle
Diurnal cycle
It would effect the earth's electromagnetic field as it is the spinning of the earth's core that creates the field.
If you observe the Earth from below the South Pole, it would appear to be spinning in a counterclockwise direction.
Day and night.
This is impossible but, the earth would keep spinning for a while but would be swirling further and further away from its neighbouring planets and we would freeze immediately. The moon would probably slow to but as the earths gravity weakens, the moon would drift away from us.
Diurnal cycle
yes
If the Earth stopped spinning completely, there would be just one day and one night a year. Six months of daylight would be followed by six months of night. ... The spinning of the Earth is also partially responsible for the Earth's magnetic field. No spin means no magnetic field HOPE THAT HELP!
The duration of the day is directly related to Earth's rotation (spinning). If Earth would spin slower, the days would get longer. This is not hypothetical; Earth is indeed spinning slower and slower - although that's not a quick process, but one that has been going on for millions of years. In the hypothetical case that Earth stopped spinning altogether - though this is not likely to happen - the length of a day would be equal to a year; sunrise and sunset would be caused by Earth's movement around the Sun.
Because earth is so big that we can't feel it spinning unless you are at the middle of the core.
Very little as it is spinning at a constant speed. However, the moon does affect the Earth's seas, greatly.
The spinning of the Earth affects the Earth's water by creating currents and winds. The spinning of the earth is necessary to complete the water cycle and establish weather patterns.
Yes, it is theoretically possible for the Earth to stop spinning, but it would have catastrophic consequences for life on the planet. The Earth's rotation creates the day-night cycle and affects the planet's climate and weather patterns. If the Earth were to suddenly stop spinning, the oceans and atmosphere would continue to move, causing extreme winds and changes in temperature. This would likely lead to widespread destruction and loss of life.
It would effect the earth's electromagnetic field as it is the spinning of the earth's core that creates the field.
No, the mass dictates the gravitational forces.
No. Once an object starts spinning it does not need anything to keep it spinning. In fact it would take a force to stop the rotation. Earth has been rotating since it first formed and its angular momentum has kept it spinning.
Yes... sort of. The reason for the qualification there is that it's a little more complicated than that, and it partially depends on what you mean by "not spinning". If the Earth were tidally locked with the Sun, the Sun would not appear to rise or set; it would remain in pretty much the same place in the sky. However, in that case the Earth would still be "spinning" ... it's just that its periods of rotation and revolution would be the same. If the Earth were not spinning at all, the STARS would not appear to rise and set, but the Sun would rise and set once (each) per year. The Moon is a separate issue. The fact that the Moon revolves around the Earth means that it will rise and set regardless of whether the Earth spins or not unless the Earth were tidally locked with the Moon. Again, in that case the Earth would be spinning, but each "day" would be about a month long, and the Sun would rise and set 12 or 13 times (each) per year.