The way things are right now a total eclipse of the sun by the moon is a pretty close match in size. The only part of the sun not covered by a total eclipse is the photosphere, and during a total eclipse is one of the rare occasions when scientists can observe it directly. If the moon was smaller you would see a ring of sun when the eclipse was 'full'. It would be more of a transition than a true eclipse.
There are two questions here.
The apparent size of the moon is almost exactly the same as the apparent size of the sun. The size of the moon is critical for a solar eclipse, so much so that the very small variation in distance between the Earth and the moon causes qualitatively different types of eclipses. (Total eclipse and annular eclipse.) If the moon were more than a 5% smaller, we would never have a total solar eclipse and never an annular eclipse it were a small amount larger. The mass of the moon has no immediate effect on solar eclipses.
If there were a change in the mass of the moon or its distance from the Earth, the effect on tides would be seen. A heavier moon, even at the same distance, would orbit at a faster rate and the gravitational force would be greater. These things would create larger tides and the opposite for smaller mass. The size of the moon has no immediate effect on tides. (Just a technicality, but the change in the orbital period due to increase moon mass at the same distance is not very large if the moon stays close to its current mass which is less than 1/80th the mass of the Earth. One can almost ignore the issue of the change in period because the "reduced mass" is almost identical to the mass of the Earth. The basic answer remains the same if one ignores the change in orbital period.)
Yes, a little. The Earth's shadow is large enough to completely cover the Moon during a lunar eclipse. If the Earth were enough smaller, then there would be a dark spot on the Moon rather than the whole thing being darkened. This is what happens with the Moon's shadow on the Earth; it's a dark spot.
If the Earth were MUCH smaller, then the proportion of the Earth darkened in a solar eclipse would be much greater, but nobody would be here to notice - because if the Earth were that much smaller, we wouldn't be able to live here.
Yes, because then the earth would be total darknes and we and earth as we knoe it would die.
In this scenario, we would only have Annular Solar Eclipses and no Total Solar Eclipses of Sun
No - there are far more small impactors than large impactors present in the solar system.
It will look dimmer and dimmer. Also, smaller and smaller (the angular diameter gets to be smaller and smaller).
A primeval atom is the term sometimes used to describe the Big Bang beginning. Quantum theory says this original seed was the size of an apple, Relativity says it was smaller than a subatomic particle, or even zero size. All this is difficult to imagine, since it was not mass that expanded, but space itself.
The Moon is Smaller then the Earth.
Shadows can get smaller and bigger. it depends on where you are.
The solute.
Imagine that little thing at the back of your throat, that dangles down, now imagine a much smaller version, smaller than an ants head etc, exact on your tongue. Then imagine lots of those little things all on your tongue, and there you have it!
Imagine that little thing at the back of your throat, that dangles down, now imagine a much smaller version, smaller than an ants head etc, exact on your tongue. Then imagine lots of those little things all on your tongue, and there you have it!
The solute.
solute
Solute
Pick up a needle. Imagine that needle's size if it was 1000000 times smaller. That is the size of Lewis Alexander's penis. Pick up a needle. Imagine that needle's size if it was 1000000 times smaller. That is the size of Lewis Alexander's penis.
The substance in a solution that is present in the smaller amount is called the solute. The substance that has a higher amount is called the solvent.
less sugar
Solute
Vacuoles are present in animal cell but they are much smaller than in plant cell.
Evolutionists say that the smaller the animal the smaller the number of chromosomes.