0
Is The moon was full 4 weeks ago so it should be full again tonight an inductive or deductive argument?
The statement "The moon was full 4 weeks ago, so it should be full again tonight" is an example of an inductive argument. It draws a general conclusion based on a specific observation—that the moon is typically full approximately every 29.5 days. While the reasoning may seem plausible, it does not guarantee that the moon will be full again tonight, as inductive reasoning is based on probability rather than certainty.
What else can I help you with?
What is wrong with the following sentence you love to stargaze however tonight was too cold for enjoying the stars?
In the sentence you love to stargaze, however tonight was too cold for enjoying the stars it is the improper use of voice.
What is the difference between the cosmological theory and the cosmological argument?
Cosmological theory is a scientific theory . (It should be noted that a scientific theory differs greatly from common notions of what a theory is) . A cosmological theory takes scientific facts, raw data, evidence & logical argumentation & organizes it as an explanation of the cosmos ... The "argument" is purely philosophical in nature. It's origins are widely attributed a Muslim named Kalam in the Middle Ages. It sought to use the workings of the cosmos as a proof for the existence of a god. It positions a god as a kind of "first mover". However; the argument is weak & has been refuted on many levels. It's based on a misunderstanding of "cause & effect".
What direction do you look in to see Jupiter tonight?
As of August 2014, Jupiter will not be visible in the night sky. It will reappear in September 2015 in the southern sky near the constellation Leo.
Are you going to see moon tonight in London?
As a virtual assistant, I don't have physical experiences. However, seeing the moon in London would depend on weather conditions and visibility. If the sky is clear, you should be able to see the moon from London.
What are some constellations you can see in the summer from MorningsideMD?
By 9:00 pm tonight you should be able to see: Leo (just setting) Virgo, Ursa Major, Bootes, Hercules, Aquila, Cygnus, and Cephus (roughly west to east ). This will remain so for the next few nights as the stars set roughly 4 minutes earlier each night.
How do you formulate a deductive or inductive argument?
Deductive reasoning is reasoning that starts with general principles to form a conclusion about a specific case. To formulate a deductive argument, you should take a general idea or concept, like an ideology or commonly shared moral view and relate it to a more specific subject that links to your side of the argument. Inductive reasoning is the exact opposite; it involves developing a set of specific facts to create a general principle. To formulate an inductive argument, you should take a set of related facts and link them to an overarching moral or concept that supports your argument.
CL hamblin on deductive and inductive reasoning?
How should I know? Its not like I am C.L.Hamblin.
What should a deductive argument never be characterized as?
A deductive argument should never be characterized as uncertain or probabilistic. It aims to provide a conclusion that necessarily follows from the premises, making it either valid or invalid based on the structure of the argument and the truth of the premises.
How Can a strong inductive argument have a false conclusion?
Since an inductive argument is an argument where the truth of the premises make it reasonable to hold that the conclusion is true, it does not necessarily guarantee it, meaning you could have a false conclusion.
Can inductive and deductive methods be used effectively used in persuasive writing?
By contrast, in a deductive essay, you start with a general principle and then apply it ...When you write an inductive essay, the validity of your conclusion will depend ... Present your conclusion, which should flow logically from your evidence. ...Rhetoric is the art of persuasion, and any effective persuasive essayfound it onnn gooogleee.
What is a deductive paragraph?
A deductive paragraph is a paragraph in which the topic sentence is stated first. The first sentence of a deductive paragraph should be the topic sentence.
Is inductive or deductive reasoning the best way to approach a geometric proof?
Please remember proof gives absolute truth, which means it HAS to be true for all cases satisfying the condition. Hence, inductive reasoning will NEVER be able to be used for that ---- it only supposes that the OBSERVED is true than the rest must, that's garbage, if it's observed of course it's true (in Math), no one knows what will come next. But it's a good place to start, inductive reasoning gives a person incentive to do a full proof. Do NOT confuse inductive reasoning with inductive proof. Inductive reasoning: If a1 is true, a2 is true, and a3 is true, than a4 should be true. Inductive Proof: If a1 is true (1), and for every an, a(n+1) is true as well (2), then, since a1 is true (1), then a2 is true (2), then a3 is true (2). You see, in inductive proof, there is a process of deductive reasoning ---- proving (1) and (2). (1) is usually, just plugin case 1. (2) provides only a generic condition, asking you to derive the result (a (n+1) being true), that is deductive reasoning. In other words, proof uses implications a cause b, and b cause c hence a cause c. Inductive says though a causes c because I saw one example of it.
What is a reasonable argument?
A reasonable argument is one that is logical, supported by evidence, and free from fallacies or emotional manipulation. It should be based on sound reasoning and relevant information, leading to a conclusion that is justified and persuasive. In essence, a reasonable argument is one that can withstand critical scrutiny and is open to being evaluated and potentially revised based on new evidence or counterarguments.
What should deductive arguments never be characterized as?
True
What did Francis Bacon and English philosopher believe scientists should do?
use inductive reasoning.
What should inductive arguments never be characterized as?
Inductive arguments should never be characterized as guaranteeing truth or absolute certainty. This is because inductive reasoning relies on specific examples to draw general conclusions, which are probabilistic and open to revision based on new evidence.
Who believed that sientists should use inductive reasoning?
Francis Bacon
