true
Yes. In fact, all the planets are moving all the time. They revolve about their axes, and rotate about the sun. A heavy hit from a large space rock can cause a planet to "ring" from the impact, and a very large rock can alter a planet's orbit a bit.
There is no end. They Universe is always expanding due to the big bang. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No, the Universe actually closes in on itself. If you left from here in any direction, and you went far enough and fast enough, you would arrive right back here. In any case, the Universe does not have any boundaries.
Aristotle did not believe that the sun goes around the earth. He proposed a geocentric model of the universe where the earth was at the center and celestial bodies moved in circular paths around it.
When a planet is closest to us is not determined by the time of year. Each planet takes a different amount of time to orbit the sun. So as we are orbiting the sun, so is Jupiter, and the time we are closest to it in one year will be different the following year, as Jupiter will have moved by then.
The Catholic church taught that the earth was the center of the universe and all things moved around the earth. Man was the greatest creature of the universe.
it is made from once living things when the pangea on the earth moved away
Anton van Leeuwenhoek
If the planet moved out of it's orbit the planet can be destroyed or spin out of control
All planets have elliptical orbits.
Difference between Living and Non-living ThingsLiving things exhibit life while non-living things does not. Living things grow, produce and move; non-living things do not. Living things needs energy and can even produce their own energy just like the plants, while non-living things do not need energy since they do not grow. Living things move, even plants have movement even if it is limited. Non-living things on the other hand does not move unless influenced by another source. If living things can grow, they most absolutely have the capacity to die; non-living things do not die because they are not alive to begin with.It may be an easy subject to tackle however once you delve into the specifics of each subject, you will soon realize that there are characteristics that makes distinguishing between the two very difficult.In brief:• Living things can exhibit life while non-living things can not. They breath, grow, and need energy to exist, and most of them need air to breath.• Living things can move while non-living things can not unless if they are moved by another force.• Living things have the capacity to reproduce on their own while non-living can not unless of coursed reproduced by a living object, for example, a human making car parts.• Living things will sooner or later die while non-living things does not have the capacity to live nor die.
The ancient Greeks, specifically the philosopher Anaximenes, believed that air was the primary element in the universe that moved and transformed everything, including objects. This concept was part of their belief in an underlying substance called "aether" that governed the motion of all things.
Galileo concluded the that the earth wasn't the center of the universe because of how all the stars and planets moved. If the earth was truly the center of the universe, it wouldn't revolve.
true
Living parts of an ecosystem, such as plants and animals, are organisms that can grow, reproduce, and interact with their environment. Non-living parts, such as sunlight, water, and soil, are abiotic factors that provide the necessary resources for living organisms to survive. Both living and non-living parts are interconnected in an ecosystem and play a vital role in maintaining its balance and function.
Historically, we have moved from an Earth center Universe, to a Sun centered Universe, to the concepts of a "Steady State" Universe vs the "Big Bang" Universe. The Steady State Universe was advocated by the British astronomer Fred Hoyle. With mounting evidence for the Big Bang, Hoyle's idea has fallen by the way side. Perhaps someday the Big Bang idea will give away to a better explanation of things we have yet to discover i.e. Dark Energy and Dark Matter but believe exist.
Yes, in ancient times, the moon was considered a planet because it was believed to be a celestial body that moved independently in the sky.