Using mathematical models of the sun.
Scientists track tornadoes using Doppler radar and reports from eyewitnesses.
The Universe.
tiny organisms
scientists gather weather data from high in the sky using weather satellites
Scientists make predictions with a hypothesis. Using their observations, models, and other scientists' work, they create a statement of a possible outcome called a hypothesis. Then scientists design tests to check whether their prediction was true.
We don't need to estimate it, we can measure it (at least the surface temperature) using the cavity radiation equation and experimental observation of the solar spectrum.
yes the slower the hotter the faster the colder
no. you can estimate by using an oven therometer
4.94 to the 10 power easy shi*
Scientists can only estimate the harp seal's population. Using aerial photography and other tools, they estimate the harp seal to number in the range of 7.5 million.
More usually in the United States, but outside they mainly use Kelvin and Celsius.
If the distribution is positively skewed , then the mean will always be the highest estimate of central tendency and the mode will always be the lowest estimate of central tendency (If it is a uni-modal distribution). If the distribution is negatively skewed then mean will always be the lowest estimate of central tendency and the mode will be the highest estimate of central tendency. In both positive and negative skewed distribution the median will always be between the mean and the mode. If a distribution is less symmetrical and more skewed, you are better of using the median over the mean.
The life cycle of a blow fly is commonly used by scientists to determine the time of death of a human or animal. One way they can be unreliable in estimating the time a body was dumped is when someone does not take temperature into consideration. Temperature can affect the life cycle of a blow fly.
Yes. I think ours is even more than that.
Scientists test ideas about chemical evolution by using computer models.
Non-scientists provide additional sources of data that scientists can use.
No, because the scientists did not have a hypothesis