Other evidence supporting the Big Bang theory includes the cosmic microwave background radiation, the abundance of light elements in the universe, and the large-scale structure and distribution of galaxies in the universe. Additionally, observations of the universe's expansion and the Hubble law provide further support for the Big Bang theory.
All modern models based on science that are worth their salt would be. The only major theory I know about the origin of the universe is the Big Bang Theory, which is supported by Red Shift observations. Galaxies we can observe are all moving away (we know this due to Red Shift) from a central point, believed to be the epicenter of the Big Bang.
The Big Bang theory predicts an expanding universe. The red shift, being the Doppler effect of light when something is receding from you, confirms this because when looking at galaxies the light emitted from them is red shifted. The farther away galaxies have a higher red shift, confirming that all galaxies are moving away from each other, not just the Milky Way (i.e. the universe is expanding).
The red shift spectra of galaxies show that most galaxies are moving away from us, indicating that the universe is expanding. This observation supports the Big Bang theory, which suggests that the universe began in a state of high density and temperature and has been expanding ever since. The amount of red shift in a galaxy's spectrum can also provide information about its distance from us and its velocity.
Briefly, redshift shows that most objects move away from us; this means that the Universe is expanding.
The red shift is a Doppler effect which showed that almost all galaxies are moving away from us (or us from them), and that the farther away a galaxy is the faster it is moving. Logically, if you "move" backwards in time (a thought experiment only) then it fits that the entire universe occupied a smaller space in the past. By calculation; at about 13.7 billion years ago it occupied only a tiny volume (of space) which must have been very hot and very energetic. The "big bang" (which must have been very small and quite silent) is just a descriptive term. Or the red shift is due to light escaping from a large star...
That depends on what you mean by "these".
hi i am minakshi and the answer is that when examining the red shifts of galaxies outside our own galaxies to be moving away the observer this observation supports the big bang theory because indicates that every matter of the universe was consentrated at one place and after big bang the universe is expanding.
the big bang theory
cosmic microwave background radiation
Observations through telescopes, red shift and several other recordings proves this.
The red shift and the cosmic microwave background radiation was the evidence used to develop the big bang theory.
Some questions about the Big Bang theory and its implications for the origin of the universe include: What caused the Big Bang? How did the universe evolve after the Big Bang? What evidence supports the Big Bang theory? What are the implications of the Big Bang for our understanding of the universe's beginning and future?
Red shift caused by the galaxies moving apart.
massive energy created matterTo get to the theory ... the red shift (and Hubble).If you're referring to how the big bang began, science has no answer.
The evidence of cosmic microwave background radiation supports the Big Bang theory.
All modern models based on science that are worth their salt would be. The only major theory I know about the origin of the universe is the Big Bang Theory, which is supported by Red Shift observations. Galaxies we can observe are all moving away (we know this due to Red Shift) from a central point, believed to be the epicenter of the Big Bang.
No, it's the other way round. The Big Bang is responsible for the redshift.