The Moon orbits the Earth.
The Moons gravity causes Earths tides to ebb and flow.
The statement that astronauts on the Moon are weightless is true.
This is a false statement because the moon revolves around the earth.
No, that statement is not true. The moon has gravity, which is about one-sixth that of Earth's, regardless of the presence of air. Gravity is a property of mass, and the moon's mass generates its own gravitational pull, independent of its atmosphere. Therefore, the lack of air does not mean there is no gravity.
As bizzare as it sounds. That statement is 100% true. Now, don't get confused and start looking up pictures of the moon scouting for purple spots. It's true only in an if-then statement. IF the moon has purple spots, THEN it is June. If-then statements are made up of two things. A hypothesis, the "if" part, and the conclusion, the "then" part. Now here is where it starts getting confusing. If perhaps the hypothesis should be "illogical" like the moon having purple spots, then the statement would be considered true. On the other hand, if the hypothesis were to be:If it is June, and the conclusion being:then the moon has purple spots. That would be false, because the hypothesis falls under the realm of logic and it's counterpart, the conclusion, is false and illogical.
"The sun is a giant grapefruit" is a statement about the sun that is not true.
The statement that astronauts on the Moon are weightless is true.
This is a false statement because the moon revolves around the earth.
No, that statement is not true. The moon has gravity, which is about one-sixth that of Earth's, regardless of the presence of air. Gravity is a property of mass, and the moon's mass generates its own gravitational pull, independent of its atmosphere. Therefore, the lack of air does not mean there is no gravity.
You make a statement that is either a true one or a false one. Simple as that. For example, you might say "The moon is made of green cheese" as a false statement and most people know that's wrong.
If the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then "This statement is false" is true, making the statement false. But if the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then... It's one of the biggest paradoxes ever, just like saying, "I'm lying right now."
Circular logic would be a statement or series of statements that are true because of another statement, which is true because of the first. For example, statement A is true because statement B is true. Statement B is true because statement A is true
This statement is true.
The weight of the rock would be less on the moon compared to Earth due to the moon's weaker gravity, but the mass of the rock would remain the same.
In computing, this is an AND statement.
always true
always true
No, it is not considered slander if the statement is true.