An early collision by (proto) Earth with a large protoplanet..
There are three main theories of how the moon came into existence. The theories are as follows: the moon was captured by Earth's gravitational pull, the moon was originally part of the earth's crust, or the earth and moon formed together out of the primordial nebula.
One currently accepted theory of the Moon's creation is that it was ejecta from the earth after an impact with an asteroid or comet.
There is growing evidence and belief among Earth scientists that there was indeed a giant impact with a large body somewhere between the size(s) of Planet Mercury and Planet Mars which struck the Earth some 4.5 billion years ago. This is commonly referred to as the "Giant Impact Hypothesis". Strong support for this theory comes from many angles. One of which is the fact that Moon rock and Earth rock is derived from the same compounds. The commonly accepted name for the Planetary body believed to have struck and molded with Earth is "Theia". This designation was first proposed by the English geochemist Alex N. Halliday in 2000 and has since become accepted in the scientific community. According to modern theories of planet formation, Theia was part of a population of Mars-sized bodies that existed in the Solar System 4.5 billion years ago. Indeed, one of the attractive features of the giant impact hypothesis is that the formation of the Moon fits into the context of the formation of the Earth itself: during the course of its formation, the Earth is thought to have experienced dozens of collisions with such planet-sized bodies. The Moon-forming collision was only one such "giant impact" and perhaps the last. Because of gravity, the surface of the moon and Earth have smoothed over millions of years. Theia was engulfed by the Earth, in theory, making Earth much larger than it was prior to the impact, even though large chunks fell off which ultimately formed the moon.
Albert Einstein's theories are widely accepted because they have been extensively tested through experiments and observations, and have consistently provided accurate predictions about the natural world. The principles and concepts of his theories have been validated by the scientific community and have stood the test of time, earning them a high level of credibility and acceptance.
The most widely accepted theory is that the Moon was formed from debris ejected into space when a Mars-sized object collided with Earth early in its history. This debris eventually coalesced to form the Moon.
There are three main theories of how the moon came into existence. The theories are as follows: the moon was captured by Earth's gravitational pull, the moon was originally part of the earth's crust, or the earth and moon formed together out of the primordial nebula.
Which answer is not one of the three theories of the moon formation; 1. capture 2. parent-child co-creation 3. daughter 4. exsanquination It's difficult to read the original question, what with the lack of punctuation inherent to Wikianswers and the run-together phrasing, so perhaps I have misinterpreted the question. However; "Exsanguination" means "Bleeding". This is DEFINITELY not one of the theories of the formation of the Moon. Of course, none of the other options appear to be correct, either. The "Capture" and "co-formation" theories have been widely discredited, and the most popular explanation is that another planet, perhaps as large as Mars, collided with the nascent Earth, and that the Moon is made up of a combination of the remnants of that other body and the impact debris thrown off by the Earth.
One currently accepted theory of the Moon's creation is that it was ejecta from the earth after an impact with an asteroid or comet.
For the Earth, there are many theories, but the one that is accepted is that millions of years ago a meteorite hit the earth at an angle, causing it to tilt. It is also possible that the moon was formed by the debris that shot out of the earth when the meteorite hit it.
Yes, scientists have proposed theories to explain the formation of Earth. One widely accepted theory is that the Earth formed from accretion of dust and gas in the early solar system, approximately 4.5 billion years ago. This process led to the formation of rocky planets like Earth.
There are many theories to this question. One of the widely accepted answers is that a meteor struck the Earth, killing them.
The television show Mythbusters did a special where they tested the moon landing conspiracy theories. There are also many books and websites which also deal with the subject.
The planet Theia is a planet that was theorized to explain the formation of the Moon. The theory is that Theia was formed along with Earth at one of the Lagrangian points and then became unstable when its mass reached about 10% of Earth's mass and was attracted to and collided with Earth, thus forming the Moon. For more information, please see the Related Link below.
The Moon doesn't have a birthday in the traditional sense, as it is a natural satellite rather than a living entity. However, if one were to consider its formation, the Moon is believed to have formed about 4.5 billion years ago, shortly after the formation of the solar system. Therefore, one could whimsically celebrate the Moon's "birthday" on that approximate date.
There are several theories out there for the formation of the moon. The current most widely accpeted one is called the Giant Impact Hypothesis. The basic idea is that at some point after the young earth had formed but while the surface was still molten a Mars sized object collided with Earth and the material ejected and began orbiting the Earth. This material later formed the Moon.
A theory that has been tested, verified and universally accepted as being true can be called a law.
There is growing evidence and belief among Earth scientists that there was indeed a giant impact with a large body somewhere between the size(s) of Planet Mercury and Planet Mars which struck the Earth some 4.5 billion years ago. This is commonly referred to as the "Giant Impact Hypothesis". Strong support for this theory comes from many angles. One of which is the fact that Moon rock and Earth rock is derived from the same compounds. The commonly accepted name for the Planetary body believed to have struck and molded with Earth is "Theia". This designation was first proposed by the English geochemist Alex N. Halliday in 2000 and has since become accepted in the scientific community. According to modern theories of planet formation, Theia was part of a population of Mars-sized bodies that existed in the Solar System 4.5 billion years ago. Indeed, one of the attractive features of the giant impact hypothesis is that the formation of the Moon fits into the context of the formation of the Earth itself: during the course of its formation, the Earth is thought to have experienced dozens of collisions with such planet-sized bodies. The Moon-forming collision was only one such "giant impact" and perhaps the last. Because of gravity, the surface of the moon and Earth have smoothed over millions of years. Theia was engulfed by the Earth, in theory, making Earth much larger than it was prior to the impact, even though large chunks fell off which ultimately formed the moon.