Einstein's theories are accepted because they are supported by observations, and because no one else has promulgated theories with equal insight or mathematical basis.
The mystery of the 'Mary Celeste' has never been definitively solved. The ship was found adrift in the Atlantic Ocean in 1872 with no crew on board, leading to various theories about what happened, including piracy, mutiny, and natural disasters. However, no conclusive evidence has been found to explain the disappearance of the crew.
Albert Einstein's ambition was to unravel the mysteries of the universe through his groundbreaking theories on physics, particularly the theory of relativity. He also aimed to use his influence to promote peace and social justice, advocating for disarmament and civil rights. Additionally, Einstein aspired to inspire future generations of scientists and thinkers.
There is no scientific evidence or proof of the existence of Anunnaki star gates. The concept of Anunnaki star gates is primarily found in ancient Sumerian mythology and speculative theories.
There is no evidence to support the claim that the moon landing was a hoax. Multiple lines of evidence, including photos, videos, and samples brought back by astronauts, confirm the authenticity of the moon landing. Various independent investigations and scientific analyses have also debunked the hoax theories.
Yes, new evidence or developments in the future can cause a scientific theory to be revised or even discarded. As our understanding of the world grows and advances, theories must evolve to fit the new information. This process is a fundamental part of the scientific method.
You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.
There is no conclusive evidence that there has ever been water on the Moon. However, theories suggest there may be water trapped in ice in hidden craters of the Moon.
why are theories sometimes replaced by new theories
Scientists call theories that explain all the evidence and are widely accepted by the scientific community "well-established theories" or "well-supported theories." These theories are based on a large body of evidence and have withstood rigorous testing and scrutiny.
Some scientific principles may not be proven due to limitations in technology or methodology, complexity of the phenomenon under study, or lack of conclusive evidence. In some cases, scientific theories are continuously refined and updated as new evidence becomes available, rather than being definitively proven.
scientists are open minded because there theories fit the evidence, rather than looking for evidence to fit his theories. If the evidence starts to contradict the theories, then an open minded scientist will adjust his theories, or suggest a new hypothesis. A dogmatic, or closed minded person will ignore the evidence in order to protect the believe.
Scientific evidence supports scientific theories through empirical observations, experiments, and data analysis that consistently confirm the predictions and explanations of the theories. Theories are continuously tested and revised based on new evidence, leading to a more refined and accurate understanding of the natural world. Overall, the robustness and validity of scientific theories are demonstrated through the process of evidence accumulation and verification by multiple independent researchers.
yes a guy found it about 100 years ago he is a french scientist who wanted to discover her body
There is no conclusive scientific evidence that definitively proves that consciousness does not exist. The debate around consciousness is ongoing and complex, with various theories and perspectives. Some argue that consciousness is an emergent property of the brain, while others believe it is a fundamental aspect of reality. Ultimately, the nature of consciousness remains a philosophical and scientific mystery.
Yes.
Einsteins theories
Yes, theories can be disproved if empirical evidence contradicts the predictions or explanations proposed by the theory. This process is a fundamental aspect of the scientific method, where new evidence can lead to the modification or rejection of existing theories.