0
The nebular hypothesis is supported by several key pieces of evidence, including the observation of protoplanetary disks around young stars, which indicate the presence of gas and dust from which planets can form. Additionally, the consistent composition of planets within our solar system aligns with the hypothesis, as they exhibit a gradient in materials based on their distance from the Sun. Furthermore, computer simulations of solar system formation tend to replicate the observed structures and dynamics of planetary orbits, lending credibility to the idea that a rotating cloud of gas and dust could evolve into a solar system.
What else can I help you with?
Why is it hard to prove the nebular hypothesis?
It is difficult to prove the nebular hypothesis because the formation of solar systems happens over billions of years, making direct observation of the process challenging. Additionally, there is the lack of direct evidence from other forming solar systems to compare with our own. The hypothesis relies on simulations, models, and indirect observations to support its validity.
What is the similarity of nebular hypothesis and protoplanet hypothesis?
Both the nebular hypothesis and the protoplanet hypothesis describe the formation of the solar system from a rotating cloud of gas and dust. The nebular hypothesis suggests that this cloud, or nebula, collapsed under its own gravity to form the Sun and planets, while the protoplanet hypothesis specifically focuses on how solid materials within the nebula coalesced to form planetesimals and eventually protoplanets. Both theories emphasize the role of gravitational forces and accretion processes in the development of celestial bodies. Ultimately, they aim to explain the origin and structure of the solar system.
What theory of birth of the solar system which involves a passing star pulling dust and debris from the forming sun?
No, nobody uses the term "solar galactic hypothesis". You may be referring to a "solar nebula", in which a cloud of gas and dust collapses under its internal gravity to form a star and perhaps some planets.
What does nebular hypothesis explain?
The nebular hypothesis is the most widely accepted model in the field of cosmogony to explain the formation and evolution of the Solar System (as well as other planetary systems). It suggests that the Solar System formed from nebulous material.
Who proposed Nebular hypothesis?
The nebular hypothesis was proposed by Immanuel Kant and later developed by Pierre-Simon Laplace in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. It suggests that the Solar System originated from a rotating cloud of gas and dust, known as the solar nebula.
How the evidence from a data table supports a hypothesis?
The evidence from a data table supports a hypotheis is i dont know.
What is the circumstantial evidence that supports the hypothesis that high fructose corn syrup is harmful to humans?
The circumstantial evidence that supports that hypothesis that high fructose corn syrup is harmful to humans is the fact that obesity is so high. The instances of diabetes is another piece of circumstantial evidence that supports this.
Is the nebular hypothesis made out of helium and hydrogen?
If you have studied hard in life science you should know this but the real answer is that yes the nebular hypothesis was made by helium and hydrogen..
What evidence supports the hypothesis that whales were land dwelling mammals?
they had hip bones
Nebular Theory was proposed by?
There is evidence that the Nebular hypothesis was first proposed in 1734 by Emanuel Swedenborg.Immanuel Kant, who was familiar with Swedenborg's work, developed the theory further in 1755. A similar model was proposed in 1796 by Pierre-Simon Laplace.
What evidence supports wegener's hypothesis?
All of the continents fit together like a puzzle.
What evidence supports the hypothesis that whales evolved from land-dwlling mammals?
Theory of evolution
What evidence supports his hypothesis?
The hypothesis is supported by data from previous research studies, observational data, and controlled experiments. This data may include statistical analyses, graphs, tables, findings from literature reviews, and expert opinions. Additionally, the hypothesis may be supported by correlations, significant p-values, and reproducible results from multiple studies.
How evidence test the hypothesis?
Evidence tests a hypothesis by providing data that either supports or refutes it. This process involves collecting observations or experimental results that are relevant to the hypothesis. If the evidence consistently aligns with the predictions made by the hypothesis, it strengthens its validity; if the evidence contradicts the hypothesis, it may lead to its rejection or revision. Ultimately, rigorous testing and evaluation of evidence are essential for establishing scientific credibility.
When you're developing an argument for a persuasive essay you begin to test your hypothesis by looking for?
evidence that supports it.
One kind of evidence that supports wegener's hypothesis is that?
Major rivers on different continents match
What is the hypothesis that states that the sun and the planets developed out of the same cloud of gas and dust called?
The Nebular Hypothesis.
