Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was largely inspired by the observation that the Coastlines of South America and Africa seem to fit together like pieces of a puzzle. He also noted the similarity of geological formations and fossil records across these continents, indicating they were once connected. Additionally, the presence of identical fossils of ancient plants and animals on widely separated continents suggested they had a common landmass in the past. These observations led him to propose that continents are not static but have moved over geological time.
Is hypothesis
Wegener first noticed that it looked like South America coastline could "fit" into Africa's. After that he analysed both their continental shelve's and this showed an even closer fit. The thrid observation that brought about his theory of continental drift was that he found fossils of the same animals (can't remember any names off the top of my head sorry) in both Argentina and east Somalia, Africa. The animal is the Mesosaurus, a fossil known to live 270 million years ago. This animal was very unlikely to swim across the ocean, so the continents had to conjoined one time in the past. Hope this helps :)
The hypothesis supported by thousands of scientists states that the same observation or phenomenon is reproducible and valid across multiple experiments and studies. This consensus among scientists adds credibility and strength to the hypothesis.
Other scientists did not believe Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift in the early 20th century because he did not provide a plausible mechanism for how continents could move through the oceanic crust. Additionally, Wegener's evidence supporting his idea was largely based on geological and fossil similarities between continents, which were not considered strong enough to support such a revolutionary idea at the time. It wasn't until the mid-20th century, with the development of the theory of plate tectonics, that Wegener's hypothesis gained widespread acceptance.
The ratio of the price of tea in China to the average density of the Moon. Among other things. You might want to be more specific in questions like this.
The observation that led Alfred Wegener to develop the hypothesis of continental drift was that the continents looked like a puzzle that could fit together and then found out that fossils of similar kind and whats left of similar plants were found on opposite sides of the world.
Nothing.
Alfred Wegener couldn't describe how the plate tectonics moved. So, scientists rejected his hypothesis.
Alfred Wegener noticed that the continents looked like they could fit together like a puzzle, particularly along their coastlines. This observation led him to propose the theory of continental drift, suggesting that the continents were once joined together in a supercontinent called Pangaea.
An observation are used to form hypothesis by forming a question of which the observation and then answering it accurately.
When you are using the scientific method, you would try to imagine a hypothesis which explains an observation, but you might not succeed. A hypothesis that does not explain an observation would be considered a failed hypothesis. You would then need to invent a different hypothesis.
Observation
The significance level of the observation - under the null hypothesis. The significance level of the observation - under the null hypothesis. The significance level of the observation - under the null hypothesis. The significance level of the observation - under the null hypothesis.
An hypothesis is a theory based on observation and the knowledge of the topic.
His hypothesis of continental drift
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
A tentative explanation in research is called a hypothesis. The hypothesis is based on observation. The general explanation of the observation is called a theory. In other words, a theory is the result of testing a hypothesis.